2月底给某杂志社投的稿件，昨天返回审稿意见，编辑给了大修。貌似只有一个审稿人，给的Comments如下：
This paper addresses a interesting question and provides something new. However, there is much space to be improved. The suggestions are provided as follows:
In abstract part: the length of the abstract should be shortened.
In the introduction section: This paper are cited many papers published on conferences, and the issue is relevant to this journal is vague. The part should be revised and rewritten.
The conclusion part is also vague. The contribution of this paper should be clearly stated.
Based on the above, this paper can be accepted after the suggestions are considered.

请虫友们帮忙分析一下，问题是否尖锐，大修后有无希望。其次，由于审稿意见都比较泛泛而谈，怎么来回答审稿人比较好呢。一般是不是Response都要写的比较长？针对这种比较泛泛而谈的意见，Response怎么写得长一点呢。 返回小木虫查看更多