求助:SCI论文大修的编辑意见如何回复
投稿了一篇SCI论文,除了两位审稿人的意见,编辑也给出了意见,如下:
Editor comments: The paper has some promising research and application however I would like to draw the attention of the authors to the comments made by the two Reviewers and especially those of Reviewer 1 with which I largely agree. So I would ask the authors to respond carefully to those comments and give a thorough explanation on the points raised. The acceptance of the paper will depend on the clarifications given to those points raised by the reviewers. One of the key problems is the rather casual description of Materials and Methods which should be written in a way that the reader could follow. In addition replication should be clarified. Upon receival of the authors' responses the final decision on the manuscript will be taken.
其中 In addition replication should be clarified是说要对文章中的重复部分进行说明吗,还是别的意思?编辑也未给出文章的查重结果呀。
另外,在提交修回意见时,是否也需要对编辑的意见进行回复?谢谢大家!@Monash2011
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
是指你的实验重复性怎么样?
,