journal of applied physics投稿状态这样的是不是直接被编剧拒了
Stage Start Date
Decision Letter Being Prepared 21-Mar-2016 20:35:46
Associate Editor Decision Completed 21-Mar-2016 20:35:45
Reviewer Assignment Started 20-Mar-2016 10:41:15
Securing Associate Editor 18-Mar-2016 13:21:08
Securing Editor 18-Mar-2016 13:21:08
Submission Check by Editorial Office Completed 18-Mar-2016 13:21:07
Submission Check by Editorial Office Started 17-Mar-2016 21:34:43
Securing Editor 17-Mar-2016 21:34:42
Manuscript Submitted to Editorial Office 17-Mar-2016 21:34:41
Awaiting Author Adjustment/Approval of Converted Files 17-Mar-2016 21:32:13
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 17-Mar-2016 21:03:45
File Conversion Completed 17-Mar-2016 21:03:36
Waiting for File Conversion 17-Mar-2016 21:03:14
File Conversion Completed 17-Mar-2016 20:54:58
这样的状态是不是直接被拒了，都没有外审。悲催啊
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
被拒的可能性高达99.99999%。。。。准备改投吧
问题是我有一篇同样方法的文章，投了APL已接收。这篇在APL基础上，进一步的增加了一些内容。两篇文章的应用范围有所区别。是不是APL和JAP的associate editor是同一个人啊，觉得两篇文章类似就拒了
Stage Start Date
Manuscript Sent to Production 15-Mar-2016 13:48:14
Manuscript Ready for Production 15-Mar-2016 13:16:17
Decision Sent to Author 15-Mar-2016 13:16:17
Decision Letter Being Prepared 15-Mar-2016 12:11:16
Associate Editor Decision Completed 15-Mar-2016 12:11:16
Reviewer Assignment Started 14-Mar-2016 12:25:52
Securing Associate Editor 14-Mar-2016 12:25:52
Securing Editor 14-Mar-2016 12:25:52
Submission Check by Editorial Office Completed 14-Mar-2016 12:25:52
Submission Check by Editorial Office Started 14-Mar-2016 12:12:36
Securing Editor 14-Mar-2016 12:12:36
Manuscript Submitted to Editorial Office 14-Mar-2016 12:12:34
Awaiting Author Adjustment/Approval of Converted Files 14-Mar-2016 11:27:32
Submission Check by Editorial Office Failed 14-Mar-2016 11:27:32
Submission Check by Editorial Office Started 14-Mar-2016 01:06:32
Securing Editor 14-Mar-2016 01:06:32
Manuscript Submitted to Editorial Office 14-Mar-2016 01:06:31
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 14-Mar-2016 01:00:41
这是已接收的APL的审稿状�
，
应该是修改稿,原来的意见应该是小修,编辑直接接受.
6楼说的正确。只想说明那篇JAP的方法和APL的类似。而且加了另一个实验内容。两篇文章的应用不太一样。只能说悲催，会被JAP直接拒绝。可能是同一个编辑，觉得内容相似，没新意吧
楼主文章后来怎样了？我有一篇类似，直接被拒，理由是没有创新。