投稿ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering,传上去一周了怎么还没有回信?
rt...
编辑也没说大修小修呀,按照审稿人的意见改了,上传一周了,怎么一点信没有,不是说ACS挺快的吗?。。等有经验的虫友答复谢谢!!!也请帮忙看看这是大修还是小修呀?
Please find attached the comments of four reviewers who are in agreement that the manuscript could be publishable but not in it's current form. You will note that the reviewers have a number of concerns regarding experimental depth and indeed detail of analysis in some areas. I would be pleased to consider an amended draft and would suggest that your re submission be accompanied by a point-by-point letter of response to the reviewers comments and a narrative of changes. At this point I will also note that I will seek the opinions of our reviewers prior to making a final editorial decision. We would like to receive your revision as soon as possible.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
忘说,编辑给了一个月的修改时间,
谢谢
了
编辑观点: could be publishable (倾向接受)
修改重点: depth (应该是大修)
后续程序: seek the opinions of our reviewers prior to making a final editorial decision (取决于审稿人的满意度, 修改稿还要送给原审稿人再审, 还要等一段时间)
,
⊙_⊙
祝福宝。