唉，给据的那个人总是说我有明显英文上的错误，也不具体指出来，其他两个审稿人也没提；另外他主要的观点是认为读不懂，达不到交流的目的，擦，其他两个人怎么没这意见。感觉语气很尖锐，不知道怎么回复他，求助各位！

?The paper is very poorly written, even though with the revision, there are a lots of obvious mistakes regarding the words, punctuations, grammar. and equations. Since the paper writing is to try to communicate your research idea to others, nevertheless, this paper totally fails to satisfy this purpose.
>
> ii)there is not a clear solution for the problem. The authors hold an intuitive idea of how to compensate the secondary path error, but they are not able to propose a solid solution to this problem. This is also the main defect of this paper.?

 返回小木虫查看更多