各位前辈,近期投稿,一审两位评审给出各自意见,请各前辈指点一下是否是被接受的节奏
晚辈新人,近期投稿,一审两位评审给出各自意见,请各前辈指点一下是否是被接受的节奏以及下一步注意事项,感谢大家,祝福大家
Your manuscript has been reviewed by two referees.
You will see that the reviewers indicated several corrections and additions needed before this paper can be accepted.
Please refer to the following comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reviewer 1: This article seems to have some problems such as 1) forcible technique and 2) no experiment about active pure compounds. In addition, the significance of beginning the study from the prescriptions is not clear. Authors might be better to begin the study from crude drugs.
Reviewer 2: In Tables 1, 3, and 4, and line 10-11 in page 1, 2nd paragraph in page 3, “batch no.” may be mistake of “Product No.”. In usual, these extract granule products has 6 digits batch number ex. J29992. Batch number is assigned to a production lot and the lot size containing the individual products manufactured with a particular production recipe. The products which belongs to the same batch number are expected to be having exactly the same properties.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
万分感谢您的回复
非常感谢您的回复,我回继续加油的
,
好好修改,接收肯定没问题,
好的,明白了,万分感谢您的回复
好好修改肯定会被接受的,祝楼主好运
趋势是良好的,加油
同为新人,但感觉楼主有戏,按照审稿人的意见逐条认真回复,就算有困难无法完成,也要向审稿人说明。
万分感谢啊