很重要的一篇论文，投到Energies，一审是三个专家，两个正面一个负面，大修提交复审后进入''pending editor decision''，结果今天一查发现又变成了 ''revised version review''，给编辑发邮件咨询了一下，编辑很nice，回信如下：
Thank you for your kind information. External editor can not make final
decision according to the three reports. We have invited some other
referees to review your paper.

===================================================================
With such conflicting views I would suggest a further reviewer given
that this in an area in which I do not have sufficient expertise to
judge which opinion is more valid.
===================================================================

框里的应该是主编的意见，感觉还是第一个专家不同意，和另外两个专家意见不一致，请问大家有没有碰到过类似的情况的，最后结果如何？ 先谢谢大家了 返回小木虫查看更多