各位大神：
        小弟一篇研究性论文昨天大修后返回了小修意见，编辑的意见很容易明白，审稿人的意见是什么意思啊？没意见还是意见在附件中？邮件里系统里都没有可以下载福建的地方啊。请大家不吝赐教。附审稿意见。
Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: My suggestions were incorporated new version of the manuscript.

Subject editor: Please delete acronym TEM from the abstract - it is only introduced but not used therein.
Fig 4: denote figure parts by a), b) - not a., b.
Fig 7: denote figure parts by a), b), ... - not (a), (b), ...; in Fig 7a) provide understandable legend at the vertical axis and at the horizontal axis "Energy-keV" replace by 'Energy (keV)'; in Fig 7b) provide units of measure at both axes.
Tab 3 heading: "mg·L-1" replace by '(mg·L-1)'.
In the reference list, authors' names given as "Renata K., Bostjan E., Goran D., Joze G., Albin P." ARE INCORRECT; REPLACE BY 'Kaplan R., Erjavec B., Drazic G., Grdadolnik J., Pintar A.'. 返回小木虫查看更多