Dear...
Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. As you will appreciate, unfortunately, the reviewers have addressed several concepts which would need to be carefully revised and extended before the paper can be considered for publication in Mechanism and Machine Theory. Therefore I regret to inform you that I must reject your contribution based on its present state.
I hope that nevertheless the comments that you have received from the reviewers will prove useful for your work, giving you ideas and hints on how to further develop your valued contribution such that it might be re-considered in future.
For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
Yours sincerely,
.........

Reviewers' comments:
Literature review is incomplete. For example, following paper has not been cited:
T.C. Gupta, K . Gupta and D.K.Sehgal, 2011, "Instability and Chaos of a Flexible Rotor Ball Bearing System: An Investigation on the Influence of Rotating Imbalance and Bearing Clearance," ASME J. Engg. Gas Turbines and Power, 138 (8).
In fact, this paper addresses similar issues.
Although the title of this paper contains "…...  traction motor", Figure 4 is a standard rotor bearing model.
In Figures 5 and 13, do authors mean "amplitude"? 返回小木虫查看更多