第一次APL投稿,图片分辨率糟糕,这样的审稿结果还能申诉吗?哎,求经验人指导。。。
以下是审稿人的评价,
Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Mandatory revision
Paper Interesting: No
Original Paper: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized: Yes
Clear and Error Free: Yes
Conclusions Supported: Yes
Appropriate Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Satisfactory English: No
Adequate References: Yes
Clear Figures: No
Reviewer #1 (Comments to the Author):
The manuscript presents a study of plasma patterns, which may be relevant for emerging plasma metamaterials applications. The paper describes different knobs to control electrically plasma patterns for the fixed geometrical structure.
I would suggest checking English language for single/plural forms and increasing resolution of the figures.
Reviewer #2 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Reject
Paper Interesting: No
Original Paper: Yes
Sufficient Physics: No
Well Organized: No
Clear and Error Free: No
Conclusions Supported: No
Appropriate Title: Yes
Good Abstract: No
Satisfactory English: Yes
Adequate References: Yes
Clear Figures: No
OVERALL RATING: Fair
Reviewer #2 (Comments to the Author):
I am very sorry but I do not understand anything in the electrode geometry because the author's explanations are not clear and the quality of figure 1 is bad. Subsequently, I cannot estimate the relevency of the experimantal study.
Moreover, the current curves are very noisy and it seems that the measurements have not been well conducted.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
求大神指点,这种情况是不是就是没可能了
图片分辨率不是主要原因吧
当然文章描述也是致命的,这种情况有有申述的必要吗
,
最主要的是Paper Interesting,跟图片分辨率关系不大。