REVIEWER REPORT

EVALUATION:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

1. Please rate the importance of the reported results

Reviewer #1: Important

Reviewer #2: Important

--------------------

2. Please rate the citation of previous publications

Reviewer #1: Insufficient

Reviewer #2: Appropriate

--------------------

3. Please rate the length of the manuscript

Reviewer #1: Too short

Reviewer #2: Concise

--------------------

4. Please rate the verification of hypotheses and conclusions by the presented data

Reviewer #1: Minor inconsistencies

Reviewer #2: Fully consistent

--------------------

5. Please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate

Reviewer #1:
*Other (please include in your report)

Reviewer #2:
*----

第一个审稿人感觉很奇怪，压根就不像是我这个领域的，他关注的好像只是部分东西，而这部分东西刚好又不是楼主的重心。他提出了好多问题，楼主都放在附件里面了，他好像压根就没看。他还说文章太短，但是一般angew的长度不能超过15000个字符，楼主刚好这么多，不知道该怎么办，要申诉么。 编辑的意见是拒稿，然后说
P.S.:  A thoroughly revised manuscript could become publishable in Chemistry - A European Journal.
Angewandte Chemie, a journal of the Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker (German Chemical Society, GDCh),
published by Wiley-VCH: www.wiley-vch.de。
chemistry是个什么杂志？ 返回小木虫查看更多