AE给了AQ（Accept with mandatory minor revisions），2个审稿人，总体意见如下：
Reviewer 1:
Additional Questions:
1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes
2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes
Explain:  
3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Novel
4. How would you rate the English usage? : Satisfactory
6. Rate the references: Satisfactory

Reviewer 2:
Additional Questions:
1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Perhaps
2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Moderately So
Explain:  
3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Somewhat Novel
4. How would you rate the English usage? : Satisfactory
6. Rate the references: Unsatisfactory (explain): Some of the important references related to this work are missing

AQ总共有14天的修改期，reviewer 1的意见有12条，reviewer 2的意见有4条。我现在的问题是，其中的3条比较难改，需要额外实验及较多篇幅讨论。因为SPL只允许4页，这种情况下怎么办呢？恳请有IEEE SPL投稿经验的童鞋指教，谢谢！ 返回小木虫查看更多