APL投稿,一个大修,一个小修,各位大神帮忙看看有戏吗
Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with mandatory revision (minor)
Paper Interesting: Yes
Original Paper: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized: Yes
Clear and Error Free: No
Conclusions Supported: Yes
Appropriate Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Satisfactory English: No
Adequate References: Yes
Clear Figures: Yes
OVERALL RATING: Good
Reviewer #1 (Comments to the Author):
In my opinion, the manuscript can be published in Applied Physics Letters after proposed revision.
Reviewer #2 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Reconsider for APL after mandatory revision (major)
Paper Interesting: No
Original Paper: Yes
Sufficient Physics: No
Well Organized: No
Clear and Error Free: No
Conclusions Supported: No
Appropriate Title: Yes
Good Abstract: No
Satisfactory English: No
Adequate References: Yes
Clear Figures: Yes
OVERALL RATING: Fair
Reviewer #2 (Comments to the Author):
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
这种按审稿人意见修改之后一般就接收了,没问题的
肯定游戏,好好改就没问题
不知道审稿人给编辑的意见是什么。如果第二个审稿人给编辑的意见不是拒稿,你修改的到位的话接收的可能性很大。但是不知道审稿意见是否尖锐,是否好回答。还是重点放在文章的修改和回答上吧,这个是接收不接收的关键。祝好运!
必须有戏,认真修改就行了,祝好
renzhenxiugai,顺利成功!!
修改是必须的。第一个审稿人给的意见倒很好回复和修改。第二审稿人很苛刻,意见尖锐,貌似理论很强,然实验与理论是需要结合的。先不管了,认真修改再说。希望成功
,