大家看看返回的意见是给了修改机会么,还是婉拒?
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to International Journal of Hydrogen Energy . I regret to inform you that reviewers have advised against publishing your manuscript, and we must therefore reject it.
Please refer to the comments listed at the end of this letter for details of why I reached this decision.
If you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers\' comments, I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript as a new submission.
I would be happy to consider a re-submitted manuscript, which addresses the issues presented by the reviewers.
We appreciate your submitting your manuscript to this journal and for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
一审还是二审结果?
感觉拒得很明显啊
换个期刊吧,这个是直接拒稿。后面让你修改后重投基本就是客气话~我曾经跟很多期刊主编请教过这种问题,他们机会给拒稿的人都这样发。如果不是审稿人的问题的话,建议你就好好修改换个其他期刊
你好好看看审稿人意见如果可以就好好修改。之前听过一个编辑的报告,说这样的情况比拒稿要好一点,如果收到修改后重新投的,他们会给原来的审稿人审阅,同时为了公平还会邀请新的审稿人审阅。所以如果你很希望中这个杂志就好好改,改的好就蛮有希望的别敷衍人家提的问题
,