着急,很长时间了,请教了好多人,还是没弄清这个审稿意见是什么意思!
(很抱歉,同一个问题现在是问第三遍了...但原来的帖子不能在描述问题的第一楼编辑,只能在后面跟帖进一步说明。担心因为看起来麻烦,好多大牛不能把前后连起来,可能就不再回答了。 我也确实有些着急了,就再发一帖吧。)
投稿的文章,现在返回第二轮审稿意见,其中有一条意见是这样的:
I appreciate the sincere efforts made by the author. Now After reading the corrections and suggestions and then paper i could understand the concept and the results.
However, It will be helpful to a reader to know what and why such plots are used?
请教大家,这个"what and why such plots are used?"是指的什么呢?
这个审稿人在第一轮审稿时给了6条意见,这儿也一并附上,方便大家结合起来看:
Round 1:
1. Significant Grammar mistakes in first para of the introduction.
2. what is t^2 in equation (1) ?
3. Notations are not properly defined.
4. How is FLO statistics is applied and justified. I could not understand clearly.
5. I feel that it would be better if justification of flo approach also in detail.
6. Results: FLOs are only compared and not with RAT, and others. Refine results
Round 2:
I appreciate the sincere efforts made by the author. Now After reading the corrections and suggestions and then paper i could understand the concept and the results.
However, It will be helpful to a reader to know what and why such plots are used?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
我觉得是说你对图标的分析不够,再解释下为什么用这些图表,用的意义在那
图表,打错了
谢谢回复。
我文中的图有6个,每个图又有若干个子图。实际上每个图都有描述说明和分析。所以我就弄不清他是指所有的图,还是怎么回事
,