小弟今年10月投稿JAP，编辑建议转投到AIP ADVANCES，第一次审稿后意见如下：
Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Publish with mandatory revision (minor)
Original Paper required: Yes
Well Organized and Clear required : Yes
Free From Errors required : No
Conclusions Supported required : Yes
Satisfactory English required : Yes
Appropriate Title required : Yes
Good Abstract required : Yes
Clear Figures required : No
Adequate References required : No

AIP Advances is an appropriate journal for this paper, because this paper addressed the study of thermal and electrical characteristics of the XXX.
Although this work seems very interesting, several points need be addressed to increase the strength of the paper:
1. The authors didn't explain well how good the performance of their XXX is compared with those in the previous studies, and what are their XXX's advantages over those reported in the literatures. The ingenuity and the impact of the paper are doubtful.
2. The theoretical part of the manuscript is not written in a rigorous way. The authors didn't explain the meanings of each symbol in the equations. They also didn't describe how the simulations in section 2.3 and 3 were done, including the equations they used, the parameter values they chose, the boundary conditions they applied, and even a clear computational geometry.
3. The qualities of images are all very low. I suggest that the authors redraw those figures and improve the image quality.
请各位大牛虫友帮忙看看，这篇文章是不是已经没救了，还是说仍然存留一线希望？
拜托大家！！！ 返回小木虫查看更多