本人第一次投advanced materials. 10月20号生日那天投稿（巧合）。然后11月11号收到一审意见， 如下：一个接受，两个转投；接受的说文章挺好，但是要回答一些问题。一个转投的说文章亮点不够突出。 另一个转投的说有两种技术结果需要重新做。一共16个问题。 编辑给了三周时间修改（大修）。不知道为什么没有拒掉，老师也挺惊讶。12月2号投了修改稿，5000 多个字，比文章都多了，补了一些数据，但是有些数据没时间补，只能进一步解释。到今天还没有消息。 有经验的虫友， 帮分析一下啊！
Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Please rate the importance of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Should be published in this journal

Reviewer #3: Could be considered for a sister journal

Reviewer #4: Could be considered for a sister journal

--------------------

Please rate the originality of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Insufficient level of new results

Reviewer #3: Insufficient level of new results

Reviewer #4: Acceptable level of new results

--------------------

Please rate the scientific and technical content of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Major inconsistencies or inaccuracies

Reviewer #3: Fully consistent and accurate

Reviewer #4: Major inconsistencies or inaccuracies

--------------------

Please rate the length of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Requires additional information

Reviewer #3: Concise and correct length

Reviewer #4: Concise and correct length 返回小木虫查看更多