IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics审稿三个月了,怎么破。。。
9月15号 Awaiting AE Assignment
9月16号 In review process
9月25号 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
至今,12月10号,奔着三个月了。
听说肯定悲剧了,但是能不能出个结果。。。。让我死心了
==========================================
审了六个月。。。。最后是Revision (6 weeks, neither accept or reject) (18-Feb-2016)
感觉希望不大,拖到今天24号才投的修改稿,现在是In review process
又一个循环
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2016-3-25 at 18:03 ]
The reviewer(s) have recommended a major revision.
AE's Comments to Author:
Associate Editor
Comments to the Author (Required):
The reviewers conclude that the manuscript has novelty. However, both reviewers have comments that require a significant amount of work. The authors should address all these issues before submitting a revised manuscript.
Reviewer Responses:
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Revision – The paper is not accepted, but authors are given one chance to respond to reviewers’ comments with a revision in 6 weeks or less.
Reviewer: 2
Recommendation: Accept with mandatory changes - The paper cannot be published in its current form, but is provisionally accepted if authors incorporate mandatory changes suggested by reviewers. Changes require re-review but are relatively minor.
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2016-3-27 at 01:43 ]
什么这个状态又持续快一个月了啊。。。。
ADM: Not Assigned
In review process
不懂啊,难道又是一个轮回吗?
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2016-4-18 at 15:18 ]
//==============================================
又快两个月了。。。。
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2016-5-18 at 14:04 ]
6月8号变成EIC decision
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2016-6-9 at 14:24 ]
6月9号,Accept with minor revisions or without change (09-Jun-2016)
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2016-6-9 at 23:52 ]
==============================================================
for second
7.9 submit Awaiting Admin Processing
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2017-7-10 at 14:48 ]
==========================================
7.10 Sorensen, Lindsay 上班了 Awaiting AE Assignment
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2017-7-11 at 00:03 ]
7.11 in review process
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2017-7-11 at 13:07 ]
7.15 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 又到激动人心的时刻了。
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2017-7-15 at 13:30 ]
=======================================
Awaiting AE recommendation 8 12
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2017-8-12 at 17:55 ]
===========================================
Awaiting EIC Decision 2017 9 16
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2017-9-16 at 03:20 ]
======================================================
31-Dec-2017
In review process
2-1-2018
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2018-1-5 at 13:59 ]
======================
Awaiting Reviewer Scores
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2018-1-10 at 19:26 ]
Awaiting AE Recommendation
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2018-2-10 at 21:58 ]
Conditionally accept with major mandatory changes (4 weeks) (23-Feb-2018)
Due on: 23-Mar-2018
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2018-2-23 at 21:59 ]
in review process 2018 3 13
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2018-3-13 at 19:45 ]
============================
Awaiting Reviewer Scores 3. 23
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2018-4-2 at 20:05 ]
===============================================================
Awaiting AE Recommendation
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2018-4-20 at 20:36 ]
Awaiting EIC Decision
[ Last edited by liyujk on 2018-4-24 at 21:12 ]
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
我的也是,明天就满3个月了,一点动静都没有……
为啥肯定会悲剧?
在米国审稿的同学说一般一个多月就结果了
没事,再耐心等会儿。这会儿说不定人家忙着准备圣诞呢。
由于TPEL原来的审稿速度快,所以大量的电力电子方面的稿件都投向她,使得TPEL累积的论文数量巨大。
要解决这个问题有2种手段可以做:一是提高审稿标准;二是拖慢审稿节奏。
现在TPEL就是这么做的。目前TPEL审稿时间明显拖长了,再就是增加了有效的审稿人数,人数一多,分歧就容易大,审稿时间就会变长,拒稿的可能性也会增大。
以我的经验,目前TPEL第一轮审稿如果近3个月还没结果,一般结果都不太好。
一种情况说明有效审稿人有限。如果有审稿人拖,致使一直无法达到最低审结人数要求,AE也无法给出结果。审稿人拖的原因是没读懂你的论文,或者找不出亮点,无法使审稿人给出正面结果。就只好找毛病,慢慢找。
另一种情况就是审稿人的意见不一致,AE只好找更多的审稿人。我目前审的所有稿件中,最多的审稿人数有达5人的,所以拖个3、4个月很正常。
另外这种审稿周期被拖长了的结果被拒的论文是不会影响已被录用论文的平均审稿周期的,所以AE无压力,
感觉好悲催,指望这篇毕业呢。。。
有消息了我们相互通知下呗