SCI论文结果和讨论部分如何分开写?
投了无数次稿,但一直以结果讨论部分放到一起来写的文章。初次遇到一期刊要求把论文结果和讨论部分分开写的要求,实验室从未按这个要求写过文章,真的是不会改啊!小修,要求两星期内返回审稿意见,捉急,各位走过路过的同仁,求支招。
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
投了无数次稿,但一直以结果讨论部分放到一起来写的文章。初次遇到一期刊要求把论文结果和讨论部分分开写的要求,实验室从未按这个要求写过文章,真的是不会改啊!小修,要求两星期内返回审稿意见,捉急,各位走过路过的同仁,求支招。
返回小木虫查看更多
结果就是把实验观察或表图中的发现进行描述即可;
讨论:针对上述的结果,分析出现这种结果的原因,有什么意义?根据这种发现能解决什么问题?(如对经典理论的拓展、延伸等)
卤戮脠脣赂脮掳脩脪禄脝陋脦脛脮脗碌脛陆谩鹿没脤脰脗脹虏冒鲁脡脕脣陆谩鹿没潞脥脤脰脗脹隆拢脪虏脢脟脡贸赂氓脠脣脪陋脟贸碌脛拢卢戮脥掳脩脧脰脧贸脕么脳脜拢卢路脰脦枚潞脥脤脰脗脹露录脛脙碌陆脧脗脪禄脮脗拢卢脠禄潞贸脮脪脪禄脨漏鹿脴脕陋碌脛脛脷脠脻脭脵脤脰脗脹脪禄脧脗隆拢脦脪脦脛脮脗碌脛脦脢脤芒潞脥禄脴赂麓露录脤霉赂酶脛茫脕脣鹿镁拢隆
隆陋隆陋隆陋隆陋隆陋隆陋隆陋隆陋
7. In the present form, the paper concentrates on the phenomenology of the power handling capability and lists the observation for the different analytical techniques. However, relatively small space is dedicated to a discussion of the observed effects. The authors may restructure the present version and add an additional section for discussion of the laser damage thresholds with respect to the analytical results.
Response: We have restructured the previous version according to the reviewer隆炉s suggestion. We put the previous Section 4 (Damage performance measurement) and Section 5 (Discussion) together as a new Section 4 (Results) and added an additional Section 5 (Discussion) for discussion of the laser damage threshold with respect to the analytical results. Considering that Section 5 was added, we have rearranged the subsection numbers in the revised version
,
结果主要是描述性的,就把得到什么结果列出来即可。而讨论需要比较深入,就是这个结果说明了什么,有什么应用,与其他的结果对比有什么不同等。
你好,我最近想投一篇文章,就是想找结果讨论合在一起的期刊,但又不知道哪些期刊是合在一起的,能否给我推荐下,研究方向是细胞免疫。谢谢,不胜感激
biomaterials驴陋脢录碌脛潞脺露脿露录脢脟陆谩鹿没脤脰脗脹脭脷脪禄脝冒碌脛鹿镁拢隆