九月份投稿的，到今天才返回修改意见，编辑意见如下：Reviewers and editors commented on your above paper, and indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. If you feel that you can suitably address the comments below, I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 30 days from today.
有两个审稿人，第一个意见：The paper deals with an interesting topic. What is more it looks well structured and the proposed approach looks sound.The authors should stress the following aspects giving comments and information.
- The effects of the welding process parameters should be considered with a specific sensitivity analysis.
- The final aim of the contribution should be highlighted in terms of quality and mechanical performances of the product.
第二个审稿人中提了12个要修改的地方：
Comments: The paper investigated the influence of nitrogen alloying on precipitating of the second phases in the CGHAZ of V-Ti micro-alloyed shipbuilding steels using Gleeble-3800 and TEM combined with thermo-chemical calculation, and analyzed size distributions and chemical compositions of precipitating particles during the weld thermal cycling. Although drawing some interesting conclusions, descriptions about the results and conclusions, even methods are more superficial and rough than it otherwise would be. In addition, there are many mistakes in the manuscript. Therefore, some improvements should be implemented in the paper before it can be published in Materials and Design.
不知道还有没有希望啊，编辑是不是不看好这篇文章啊？心里好没底啊！！！大家有没有类似的经历啊？？？ 返回小木虫查看更多