当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >sci论文修改意见

sci论文修改意见

作者 tuwenfeng
来源: 小木虫 200 4 举报帖子
+关注

Comments & Recommendations
1- The authors present a paper on the water inrush in karst tunnels. The paper is based on existing references,issued by the same authors and collaborators, which give a synthesis of governing parameters. The present paper should show explicitly :
- what was already issued on existing papers and conferences
- a brief synthesis of the results that are already published
- what is really new and has never published elsewhere. Rather than only presented qualitative and descriptive analysis, it should present, for instance, a quantitative methodology able to quantify and predict the risk of disaster.

2- Suggestions and comments are provided on the enclosed report. It would be suggested that the paper provides either methodology to evaluate and quantify the risk of disaster.
3- Major corrections are suggested
Paper needs major corrections.
各位大神求指教啊,上面1和2说的什么意思呢,录用的可能性大不大呢,不知怎么回复 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • nono2009

    1.大概的意思是你应该更清楚的表明这篇论文与你之前发表的同类论文之间的联系。什么是已经发表过的,什么是新的。

  • tuwenfeng

    引用回帖:
    2楼: Originally posted by nono2009 at 2015-11-21 18:28:16
    1.大概的意思是你应该更清楚的表明这篇论文与你之前发表的同类论文之间的联系。什么是已经发表过的,什么是新的。

    最后说让大修,还有机会录用吗

  • nono2009

    引用回帖:
    3楼: Originally posted by tuwenfeng at 2015-11-22 09:17:53
    最后说让大修,还有机会录用吗?...

    给修改的话,录用的机会通常都在80%以上,关键是看你的修改情况是否让审稿人和编辑满意。

  • tuwenfeng

    引用回帖:
    4楼: Originally posted by nono2009 at 2015-11-22 09:22:59
    给修改的话,录用的机会通常都在80%以上,关键是看你的修改情况是否让审稿人和编辑满意。...

    多谢

猜你喜欢