文章第一次的意见是大修，修改好之后返回，这次的意见是小修，但是审稿意见有点看不太懂，请大家帮忙看看这次审稿意见是什么意思，具体意见如下：

We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "*****", submitted to ****

Based on the advice received, I have decided that your manuscript can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections as suggested by the reviewer(s).

Please find the reviewers' comments below for your perusal.

You are kindly requested to also check the website for possible reviewer attachment(s).

Please submit your revised manuscript online by using
the Editorial Manager system which can be accessed at:

****
Your username is: ********
Your password is: ********

To submit your revision, please login as author and click the Submissions Needing Revision link.

Also, please make sure to submit your editable source files (i. e. Word, TeX).

I am looking forward to receiving your revised manuscript
before 12/15/2015



********


Comments for the Author:

Editor: **** journal publishes quality papers that significantly advance the science, with novel concepts and new insights comparing with recent related researches. I would like to suggest that the authors compare their results with current researches published in 2011-2015 to show new contributions of the study 返回小木虫查看更多