SCI论文回复审稿人求助
各位老师好:
最近投了一篇论文二审回来大修,有一个审稿人提了一个意见,我想了很久不知道怎么回复,只有这个审稿人有意见了。
各位老师能不能帮我看看怎么回复好,非常感激!
I commend the authors for addressing most problems raised in previous review, but I would like to recommend authors to submit this manuscript to a different journal that focuses more on applications than research. I also have following comments for authors, which are provided to improve the quality of this manuscript.
1. The research questions lack details and are rather problems oriented. 针对这一条我不知道该怎么回复审稿人。
下面是编辑的看法,他后面的那句话是不是可以对于回答这个问题有点帮助。
I went through the paper myself. I can see noticeable amount of merit while agreeing with one referee that authors may wish to focus on in-depth research questions instead of focusing on a sophisticated math model and solution algorithm. If the authors prefer to focus on the model and solution, they should highlight their major contributions along this line.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
顶
祝福
,