审稿人说有很多要补充的实验，建议改为communication，我该怎么处理文章呢？愁啊
文章昨天审稿意见回来了，三个审稿人意见，一个major revision，主要说我的英文写作水平太差，另一个也提了一些小的意见，建议修改后接收，但是但是第三个审稿人提了令我最头疼的意见，现在不知道该怎么回复第三个审稿人的意见，这篇文章超级不容易，在毕业关头，拖了五六个月被拒了，然后转投这个期刊，好不容易意见回来了，还有这么个难的问题，求大神帮忙出主意。下面是三个审稿人的意见：
Reviewer #1:
3. The brand, model and company name of the instruments, mentioned in the manuscript, should be given in the text.
4. Additional reasons and explanations can be found in the reviewed manuscript. The authors should pay attention to the highlighted text and should read all of the review notes, and then, should make corrections/revisions accordingly.
Reviewer #3: This work has a considerable amount of complementary techniques to support the conclusions: *********. Due to the lack of theoretical discussion I suggest that this work should be recommended for a short communication.
The legend of figure 4 (page 9) is switched in the text.
[ Last edited by book2005593 on 2015-10-24 at 20:53 ]
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
审稿人1意见没什么大问题吧
审稿人3意见明显是大修，你尽量再努力加把劲完善文章，好好看看类似文献别人都提供了哪些内容，怎么组织的，当然最好找个熟悉的人帮你把把关，自己的文章有时候当局者迷
建议改为communication，这个编辑没有意见？
一般如果full paper需要改为communication编辑会给意见的
编辑没有说要改，这是编辑的意见：Dear Dr. Wu,
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to consider your revision.
For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.
If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.
Please submit your revised manuscript in 21 days. If you need more time to complete the revisions, please let me know.
I would appreciate if you could submit your revised paper by Nov 13, 2015.
When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.认真读了几遍，编辑只说按审稿人要求改，难道是我理解错了？要是不按第三个人改，是不是会被拒�
，
重点不在于改文章的类型吧，你的内容大修
嗯，主要是第三个人也没说要补充哪些实验，只是提到要补充数据，然后就建议改为short communication，弄的我也不知道该怎么修改了。要是提到补充哪些数据我也好去补，直接说一句话就完了，无法下手
爱斯维尔系统的吧 哪个期刊？