当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >投稿SCI期刊初审完返回修改意见求助

投稿SCI期刊初审完返回修改意见求助

作者 telleo
来源: 小木虫 200 4 举报帖子
+关注

求助大神,第一次投稿SCI(英国的一个影响因子1.0的期刊),初审完,编辑让修改,主要的意见如下,不知道如下的意见是编辑同意修完后发还是再试试哪,一般修改完之后的录用几率大吗?本人小硕一枚,水平实在有限,请大神帮忙啊。谢谢啦,由于我现在才3个金币,不能悬赏,但是还是希望大神帮帮忙呀。

Dear Mr.XXX
The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.
However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.
Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments.

Reviewer #1: In this work, authors discuss the XXXXXXX, and carrie on a related experiment to verify their study. Before accepting for publication, please address the following minor revisions:
1)......
2)A short bibliography on Spacecraft made of functionally graded material is interesting for general readers. Authors are encouraged to discuss this point on the basis of the following works:
Bourada et al. (2015), "A new simple shear and normal deformations theory for functionally graded beams", Steel and Composite Structures, 18(2), 409 - 423.
.........
3)........

Reviewer #2:  Authors presented experimental results and corresponding analysis on the data from the experiments. However, no distinctive contributions are found the throughout the paper. It seems that the experiments they performed are based on the previous research works. The authors should clearly state the purpose/motivation of the work, the contents of the work and contributions of the work. In addition, they need to present the experimental results and discussion to support their achievement.

Reviewer #3: In summary this paper describes a XXXXXXXX. A numerical model is derived for XXXXXX and its correction method is introduced. The correction method is verified with experimental data, and the analysis data shows its numerical accuracy.
The manuscript as written needs several linguistic and grammatical work through overall pages, and it should be revised for publication. In any case there are a couple of points which deserve some attention and improvement. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • 茫茫人海1001

    不知道如下的意见是编辑同意修完后发还是再试试哪,
    答:当前稿件是被拒稿的,但如果你觉得审稿人的意见你不服或者说你觉得修改后稿件适宜发表,欢迎你修改后重修投稿,记得把你修改的部分、回答审稿人的部分着重说一下,在重投稿中。即:修改后可以再试试,现在的不行。

    一般修改完之后的录用几率大吗?本人小硕一枚,水平实在有限,请大神帮忙啊。谢谢啦
    答:概率是相对文章而言的,对你参考意义不大,如果觉得审稿人说的有理而且能改进,可以修改后重投试试,毕竟人家的意见还是要重视一下的。

  • 小木力学

    感觉你这篇文章很有希望,这要看你是否有诚意修改了,三个审稿人都没有严厉的批评你的文章,只是对你文章的目前的状态做了评价:
    1. 第一个审稿人感觉是想让你引用那篇文章,不知道你本来就已经引了,感觉问题不大,毕竟是minor revisions;
    2. 第二个审稿人和第三个审稿人明显对文章的主旨的把握不是那么的确定,说明你的文章架构写的有些问题或者语言表述上欠缺,但这些都不是问题,没有明确的拒稿或者评判,说明还是有希望的;
    3. 感觉你只要认认真真回复每个审稿人,并对文章整体的逻辑架构再确定下,修改下语言问题,对审稿人的评论做到委婉的回复,一定会有好的结果的,祝你好运,

  • telleo

    引用回帖:
    2楼: Originally posted by 茫茫人海1001 at 2015-10-08 21:53:39
    不知道如下的意见是编辑同意修完后发还是再试试哪,
    答:当前稿件是被拒稿的,但如果你觉得审稿人的意见你不服或者说你觉得修改后稿件适宜发表,欢迎你修改后重修投稿,记得把你修改的部分、回答审稿人的部分着重说 ...

    现在变成了Required Reviews Completed,揪心啊

  • telleo

    现在变成了:Required Reviews Completed,揪心啊,不知道会怎么样

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓