二审回来了,这审稿人太无语了
二审回来,满心欢喜以为能Accept, 审稿人又折腾我。。。。
Reviewer #2: The authors have included Ref [XX], which are all suitable in discussing their findings. They should however check the format of Ref [X] to make the citation format correct. In addition to these, when they discuss hardness, "These numbers are pretty impressive results in the community of structural metals community, even compared with metallic glasses, which are well known for their ultrahigh hardness among all metals [XX]They should keep this discussion instead of remove it away. So, just bring the deleted sentence back with current references [XX] supporting this discussion. I would recommend minor revision.
求问,审稿人给Minor revision 算是录用?
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
要求再进行小修
按照他说的改完就录用了,我之前也遇到过类似的,让我加个参考文献,给的也是Minor revision。修改后都没有under review,直接就录用了,
应该没什么问题了。
我的还没有回来呢。也不知道国庆前能不能回来。
这么明显还看不出来?就是说你的参考文献引用格式有错误,而且引用的位置不对,把调整后的文献引用部分发给他就可以了。
赶紧修改,趁热打铁,接收的问题不大了。
恭喜了!