第一次写SCI，老师让直接投OE，差点没把我吓尿。。。坎坷等待一个月后编辑来信让大修，看了审稿人意见，一共3个，
第一个审稿人小修后同意发表，第二个审稿人给了正面评论和修改意见，第三个审稿人个完全否定，而且提了一些跟论文主要工作不是特别相关的意见。
求助一下虫友们，像这种情况大修以后会不会还要返给第三个审稿人啊？中的概率大么。。。这几天都要抑郁了，这篇文章从做开始做到写完初稿花了快一年的时间，实在是心力憔悴啊~~

中了以后要散金币，全都散完~~
保佑~~~

附编辑回信：
Before making a decision on your manuscript, I would like to give you an opportunity to address the reviewer concerns. The reviews are appended below.

It is the policy of Optics Express to allow only one manuscript revision. Thus it is important to respond to all of the reviewer points carefully and to make it evident that you have done so. For this reason, please note any changes that have been made to the manuscript and indicate their locations. You may type your response directly into the designated comment text box provided online. You can also update your statement as a separate file. Of course, you may not agree with the reviewers on every point; in this case, your responses and reasoning should be clearly presented. Your manuscript might be sent for re-review upon resubmission. If your paper is accepted, you will not have another opportunity to submit additional content revisions. OSA cannot make any changes to your manuscript once it appears on the Forthcoming web site.

In addition to the reviewer comments, it is important that you address the production editor's notes included below, which contain format changes required to ensure that it adheres to the style guidelines of Optics Express. 返回小木虫查看更多