PRL编辑的第一段话是什么意思？
编辑的意见，最后一句话是什么意思，倾向于接收还是不接收呢？
The above manuscript has been reviewed by our referees.
The resulting reports include a critique which is sufficiently adverse
that we cannot accept your paper on the basis of material now at hand.
We append pertinent comments. We do not consider the referee's
arguments in the first paragraph of their report to be particularly
convincing as to the suitability of your manuscript for PRL.
第一个审稿人
In their paper, the authors study the *****. The paper uses
a combination of numerics, and a self-consistent Born approximation
that is strongly based on the discussion of Ref. 21, to *****
. I find the paper nicely written, and believe the results to be sound.
I would, however, recommend publication in a more specialized journal,
such as the Physical Review B, after the points listed below have been
addressed by the authors.
第二个审稿人
In this manuscript, the authors discuss ******. Their findings seem valid
and are well presented. In my opinion their findings carry enough significance
and would be of interest to a diverse community. Therefore I recommend
the manuscript to be published in PRL.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
在
拒搞
不像是据稿。因为跟了第二段
If you feel that you can overcome or refute the criticism, you may
resubmit to Physical Review Letters. If you resubmit to PRL, we are
likely to seek the advice of new referees and/or the old referees if
available. With any resubmittal, please include a summary of changes
made and a brief response to all recommendations and criticisms.
到底是第一个referee的第一段不convincing 还是第二个referee的第一段不
convincing 呢？
早贴第二段撒。
无论如何，编辑的意思是审稿人（both）第一段都是泛泛而谈的宏观评价，比如是否适合PRL，是否有BROAD interests等等。他们不是那么看重（感觉因为编辑对这方面把握更好），这里我感觉他说的是第一个审稿人的第一段的批评意见他们可能不是那么认可。因为第二个审稿人的第一段没有太多挑理的地方。
编辑的重点是你要回复好审稿人提出的具体问题。
PS，这种关键时刻需要散金币攒RP。楼主好运
，