各位大虾，小弟第一次投SCI，选的IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution。审稿意见回来了，编辑结论是Reject with Resubmit，我觉得有点疑惑：
1、这算是拒稿了吗？重投还有没有希望，感觉审稿意见也不是很尖锐啊，为什么就把我Reject了。
2、审稿意见最大的问题就是英语没写好（当初投稿确实有点匆忙），其中一个审稿意见还是很积极的，有“Good Paper”的评价，但也没有很多具体的修改意见呀？编辑的“requires significantly more work”是什么意思？我真不知道怎么“significantly”的改了。
3、编辑还给了我三个月的上传修改稿的期限，什么时候上传比较合适。
3、重投后真的是新一轮审稿吗？又要等3个月的话，我感觉真心等不了。

小弟真的是经验不足，希望大家不吝指教，有过类似经验的帮忙分析下，小弟感激不尽，望大家的论文都能顺利录用。

编辑的邮件如下：
Dear Mr. XX

GTD-XXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX(Title)

Thank you for submitting your paper to IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution. The peer review process is now complete. The referees and I feel that your paper requires significantly more work and is not acceptable for publication in its current form.  My decision is therefore to decline your paper with encouragement to submit a substantially revised paper.  I appreciate that this decision will be a disappointment, but hope that you find the referees' comments (given below) useful in improving your paper.

If, following comprehensive revision, you should choose to submit your paper again, please go to https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/iet-gtd. Enter the Author Centre and go to 'Manuscripts with Decisions'. Click on 'Create a Resubmission' next to the paper number and follow the instructions given.

When submitting a revised manuscript, please ensure that all points raised by the referees have been actioned, and include a detailed covering letter explaining the changes made.  Note that the revised paper will be treated as a completely new submission and sent out for a fresh round of reviewing.

Please note that you have until the 15-Nov-2015 to make improvements to your paper. If you need more time, it is important that you inform the IET office before the deadline so they may be able to grant an extension. If you are having trouble resubmitting your paper, please contact the IET office directly by replying to this email.

Yours sincerely

Dr. XXX
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution


Associate Editor
Comments to Author:
(There are no comments.)

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
Please check the English wording.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
Good paper but required to be made clearer to read and understood. International widely acceptable standard for symbols needs to be adopted and used: e.g.  "Z" is for impedance not inductance.
Is "Function" referring to "Equation"?
Can the authors show how there proposed method compares with the three main methods currently employed: Method 1, Method 2 and Method 3?

-----------------------------------------------补充说明----------------------------------------------------------
论文已经接收，感谢大家的帮助。统一回复感兴趣的筒子们，认真对待审稿人的意见，认真修改英语。

[ Last edited by mystupida on 2015-12-23 at 16:16 ] 返回小木虫查看更多