本人投递了一篇文章到Neurobiology of aging后3个月给的结果是        Reject Resubmission Allowed 。编辑回复如下：
Dear Dr,

I regret to tell you that we will be unable to publish your manuscript referenced above. However, you may resubmit the manuscript as a revision, if you believe you can fully address the concerns raised. When deciding whether to resubmit, please bear in mind that the revised manuscript may be rejected by the editors if it is regarded as below the priority standard of the journal, even if revised to the satisfaction of the referees.

Carefully consider the referee reports, along with any Additional Editorial Comments (if included). If you decide to resubmit, your revised manuscript must fully address all concerns and must also result in an appropriate priority score in order to proceed further.

The manuscript record can be found in the "Submissions Needing Revision" menu. When submitting your revised paper, please include a separate document uploaded as "Response to Reviews" indicating the specific modifications you have made. In the body of the manuscript text, please indicate by highlighting or color all changes made in response to the reviews.

We request that your manuscript text, tables and figure legend be submitted in an editable format (Word, WordPerfect, or LaTex only), and all figures uploaded individually as TIF or EPS files.

Due to increased submission rates, Neurobiology of Aging rejects a high percentage of manuscripts received. We appreciate your interest and hope that you will continue to send your best papers for consideration for publication in Neurobiology of Aging.

Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect (see also https://www.elsevier.com/audioslides). If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation.

Sincerely,

Editor-in-Chief
Neurobiology of Aging

-----------------------------

Additional Editorial Comments:

Two experts reviewers find substantial merit in your submission, but Reviewer 2 in particular raises a number of significant concerns. Overall, the manuscript requires very careful editing for language throughout, and the opening paragraph of the results is especially problematic. As also detailed by the reviewers, the data presented in Fig. 2 and the associated interpretation requires attention in any revised submission.
有经验的帮我看一下，修改后接受的希望大吗？还是需要该投呢。感激。。。。 返回小木虫查看更多