感谢小木虫，在这里学到了很多东西。本人研究的方向是膜分离，三个月前投了一篇文章，前天终于收到小修的通知，审稿人和编辑一共列出了一些评论，其中有一些不太明白，希望能够得到前辈的帮助：
编辑：
If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Further, please ensure that there are no language or presentation errors. In addition, can you also explain why you thought ceramic membranes would work rather than any other memnbrane?
问题: In addition, can you also explain why you thought ceramic membranes would work rather than any other memnbrane? 我是在意见回复信中解释？还是把这部分内容添加进我论文中的前言中呢？

审稿人1：
（1）Both the title and the abstract reflect the content of the article.
（2）********************
（3）*********************
（4）*********************
（5）**********************
问题：这句话是不是说我论文的标题和摘要未能完全反应全文的内容，需要修改？还是我论文的标题和摘要能反应全文的内容，不需要修改了？

审稿人2：
（1）******************
（2）*****************
（3）The data shown in the paper should add their standard deviation and also do a one-way analysis of variance.
问题：这个问题具体该怎么修改呢？是不是文中的数据要增加标准差和单向方差分析？

希望有经验的虫友帮助，谢谢！ 返回小木虫查看更多