现在是二审阶段了（审稿人一还有两个主要问题，审稿人二已经没有意见了……），对于其中一个问题，回答后又加了补充（从besides开始），补充的计算其实是额外的（也可以不用写的），补充计算中的弹性模量E被我想当然的写成了2.06E9了，其实是2.06E11~
Fig. 6 is obtained by Tylor Hobson CCI (UK) with nanometer resolution. As shown in Table 2, the wear depth and wear width are within 6 μm and 1 mm, respectively. Thus, the slider surface can still be regarded as flat and the Hertz solution is still applicable. Besides，Figure 2 shows the contact between the roller and the slider. The indentation depth is linearly proportional to the contact force, which can be written as [7]
d=4F/（3.14EL）=(4×151)/(3.14×2.06×〖10〗^9×0.007)≈13.34μm
The indentation width can be obtained as [9]
2a=2√2Rd=2√(2×0.02×13.34×〖10〗^(-6) )≈1.461mm
The wear depth (5.418 μm) is less than the indentation depth (13.34 μm) and the wear width (0.931 mm) is also less than the indentation width (1.461 mm). Thus the Hertz solution is still applicable.

这样的话，我计算结果是不能用来说明问题的（也就是说besides之后是不正确的），可是我的二审回复意见以及修改稿已经提交了……现在修改不了了，怎么办啊！！！！审稿人看到会不会直接拒稿吧！！！！天哪……怎么办啊……急死了…………
PS：这里的说明在manuscript中没有出现！而且也不是审稿人的两个主要问题…… 返回小木虫查看更多