论文审稿接近俩月后回来意见，有两个审稿意见，一个很不友好，而且我几乎看不懂，感觉跟我的文章相关性不大。另一个审稿意见都是小问题，完全可以解决。编辑给了reject，但是说advise to submit again as a new manuscript considering the following reviewers' comments。这是什么意思，是让我重新投这个期刊，还是投别的？如果还投这个期刊，审稿人会换么？中的概率大么？
另外，也请大家帮忙给点意见，看看第一个审稿人到底说的啥。

编辑的话：
Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received.  You will see that your manuscript still does not meet the level which is requried in our journal.  Therefore, once I must reject it, and I advise to submit again as a new manuscript considering the following reviewers' comments.

第一个审稿人的意见：
It is true that the authors improve the quality of the cross-section in figure 4, by the way, they must include in the paper the EDS spectra included in the answer. However, under my point of view, the paper doesn't change the main points. The critical points are just removed. Mainly in the case of impedance measurements, the authors made a comparative analysis of the diagrams measured, and although it is clear the difference with the immersion time, the measurements are really bad and they must repeat them to get valid conclusions.
Respect to the hydrophobicity of the coatings, the authors still thinking that it can be useful, however the dispersion is very high, mainly at longer immersion times, maybe because of the roughness increase. I think these values don't give additional information.(我的fig.4 明明没有横截面的，图八倒是有个表面图片) 返回小木虫查看更多