当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >这个期刊怎么没给出审稿意见,这是直接给拒稿了吗?内附2015年最新SCI因子

这个期刊怎么没给出审稿意见,这是直接给拒稿了吗?内附2015年最新SCI因子

作者 gaoxin0606
来源: 小木虫 350 7 举报帖子
+关注

我怎么被编辑搞糊涂了,不知道悲剧了还是需要进一步审稿。也没有给出审稿意见,难道是被编辑直接pass掉了?

投的是美国JALCA期刊,投过去快四个月了,编辑给了个这个。。。。。。

求各位大侠帮忙呀,指点迷津一下,是悲剧了还是没有呢?
Dear Manuscript Author,
               
I have completed my editor’s initial review of the subject manuscript you submitted and have further evaluated this work in the context of a large number of presently active new submissions. Your manuscript seems to meet some of the requirements of our Journal Publication Policy(JPP) and, with further pre-editing may qualify for peer review.

Specifically, I think it would be of interest to our readers. But it needs English language editing and major reorganization because the experimental work in mixed into the Results and Discussion.

Also, we are only able to publish about 44 original manuscripts a year, so this means that we must make choices. My selection is largely based on compliance with JPP, interest to our global readership and balance of subject matter throughout the year.

Based on the above, I have determined that I will not proceed with further consideration of this manuscript for JALCA at this time. I would reconsider a major edit that is reorganized and rewritten as note above and in compliance with our publication policy.
Thank you for considering our Journal.
Sincerely,

 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • tower598

    目前的状态不考虑进一步评审了!英语语言不太过关,文章组织也很一般吧!你看不懂吗?

  • duxin_30

    都写这么明显了

  • entomology

    附影响因子是想说明什么?

  • dragonjust

    文章需大修重投,目前文章是拒稿。

  • gaoxin0606

    引用回帖:
    4楼: Originally posted by entomology at 2015-07-19 13:11:28
    附影响因子是想说明什么?

    不知道对大家有没有用

  • 国内第一学渣

    234.楼说得很清楚了

  • nom8393

    直接拒了,回去改语言和内容吧。

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓