请大家分析拒稿原因
1个月前在journal of hazardous materials投了篇文章,今天收到回复了,
Thank you for considering the Journal of Hazardous Materials for your manuscript submission. Your manuscript has been carefully examined by the editor and is being declined for further review in the Journal of Hazardous Materials.
Although your manuscript seems to fall within the aim and scope of this journal, it is being declined for lack of sufficient novelty. The Journal of Hazardous Materials publishes papers that report novel, new and innovative results in the environmental field. We must consider each manuscript's scientific impact and interest to our readership; some factors entering into this decision include things like scope, originality, quality of the results, and significance to the discipline.
Unfortunately we are unable to accept all of the sound work submitted to us. Please be aware that even technically sound articles are not published in the Journal of Hazardous Materials if they are not sufficiently novel and/or if the contribution is considered of limited interest to the journal readership.
I regret the negative outcome but appreciate having received the manuscript for review by Journal of Hazardous Materials. At the same time, we are looking forward to receiving your future submissions.
大伙帮忙分析分析,编辑到底啥意思?谢谢。
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
创新性不够,直接被编辑拒了。
再挖掘一下亮点,换杂志投吧。
新颖性不够,直接改投吧,别纠结了
technically sound articles又是啥意思呢?
最致命的缺点是创新性差。
即使技术含量很好的文章,如果缺乏创新性,也不会被该杂志接收。
改投吧,
这个都是统一的模板,就是质量达不到期刊要求。再另找一个就行了
我跟楼主一样,哎,悲剧了,楼主后来改投了哪里?
我跟楼主一样,哎,悲剧了,楼主后来改投了哪里?