|
|
[交流]
请大家帮我看看审稿人的意见
文章是大修,其中一个审稿人的意见有两句不太明白。请大家帮我看看。
1. Another aspect that can be improved is on discussing the suitability of the selected test problems (the DeJong functions) with respect to other papers in the literature. That is, please provide a convincing argument in favour of selecting these test problems for assessing precisely a parameter setting methodology.
2. The aspect that should improve in order to make this paper publishable, is in my opinion, the discussion and comparison to alternative approaches for the same goal and the adequacy of test optimization problems. |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有11人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写
已经有8人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有4人回复
跳槽后在研项目怎么办?
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|