24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2604  |  回复: 11
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者bingjianla2008将赠送您 10 个金币

bingjianla2008

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 哪位高人能帮我看看这个审稿意见是什么意思?

Dear Dr Hong:

Your manuscript entitled "文章名" which you submitted to 杂志名, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter.

The review is in general favorable and suggest that, subject to minor revisions, your paper could be suitable for publication. Please consider these suggestions, and we look forwards to receiving your revision.

Please attend to all of the suggestions made by the reviewer. They are all very reasonable and I think should make your paper much much better.

When you revise your manuscript please highlight the changes you make in the manuscript by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or colored text.

Please enter your responses to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. You can use this space to document any changes you made to the original manuscript. Please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s).

IMPORTANT: Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to 杂志名, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission.

Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Mitochondrial DNA and I look forward to receiving your revision.

Sincerely,
Dr Rob DeSalle
杂志名, Editor-in-Chief


Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Corresponding Author
Letter to the authors
文章编号
This MS deals with interesting but bipartite subjects concerning to (1) comparative mitochondrial genomics of l物种名 and (2) lphylogeography in a Chinese major lake. This MS should thus be mede up to two separate MSs; one includes mitochondrial genomics, and the other about phylogeography. See a letter to the authors for details.

Regarding the first matter, the authors made an interesting finding of the length variation of “基因名”. It is empirically known that vertebrate “基因名” shows highly conserved features with few indels. Addition of the extra amino-acid tail may be an uncommon structural change specific to the “物种”. The authors confirmed this structural change by cDNA analysis. I am sorry, however, to say that I do not know an appropriate reference describing the length conservation of vertebrate “基因名”. The authors should find it or make an alignment by themselves from a wide range of representative vertebrates from human to sharks or lampreys.
The authors' phylogenetic analysis based on the complete mtDNA sequences gave good resolution. The tree should be just or close to the true tree, and the authors can provide strong discussions. In this regard, I think “一个物种”and “另外一个物种”also have the tailed “基因”. If so, the authors can discuss on this particular sequence structure of ”基因“ as a phylogenetic signal.
  I think the reorganized MS on the first matter will be a good and interesting report.
    Regarding the second matter, the authors may give some phylogeographical discussions on “物种名”from China including the research lake. To do this, however, the authors should first make clear the localities of loach sequences from other studies.
If adequately reorganized as a phylogeographic report, the second MS would also be worth publishing in an international journal like '杂志名'.

The content of this MS, however, is quite immature as the present delivery. The English writing style needs improvements aided by English proofreaders. The authors' data handling has several errors. See a list below for detail.
请哪位高手帮我看看,这个编辑是什么意思呢?是不是要我把文章拆成2篇发表,还是说别的意思呢?现在拿不定主意。

[ Last edited by seapass on 2012-1-3 at 11:18 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jimmy1666

新虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
seapass(金币+5): 鼓励新虫发帖!给个红包!欢迎常来论文投稿版! 2012-01-03 15:14:57
不是要把你的文章拆成2篇发表,他的主要意思是说你的文章的内容和着重点不统一,联系的不够紧密,也就是说有两个重点,但两个重点之间的逻辑性不强甚至没有多大的关联!那么这样看来你的文章实际上就是由两篇小文章组合而成!同时,相比而言,他认为该文章的第一部分更具研究价值。
2楼2012-01-03 12:46:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

epirsgis

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
avast2009(金币+2): 攻关帖特别奖励 2012-01-05 12:18:20
拆成两篇可a发表。评价很高啊。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2012-01-03 13:46:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xenopus

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
avast2009(金币+2): 攻关帖特别奖励 2012-01-05 12:18:26
如只有这一个审稿人,我觉得可以分成两篇,如还有别的审稿人,可能要慎重了
4楼2012-01-03 15:11:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yaodeyaode

木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
avast2009(金币+2): 攻关帖特别奖励 2012-01-05 12:18:33
1、编辑开篇说了本论文是小修改。

2、最好不要分成两篇,内容之间想办法更好地衔接起来就行。
5楼2012-01-03 15:46:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dkoo1jxau

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
avast2009(金币+4): 攻关帖特别奖励 2012-01-05 12:18:40
minor revisions
编辑的意思是小修改了,先恭喜楼主了。
第一位评审人的意思大概是你得内容有两大块,但从你文中的叙述来看并不是联系的很紧密,所以他觉得似乎是两个独立的内容。个人觉得你最好是能够把这两部分内容能够统一起来,一般不建议你真的删除一部分,只用其中一部分的内容。
另外,楼主做得似乎是关于新物种和一个线粒体基因组的比较以及一些进化树方面的内容,希望楼主自己把评审提到的两部分内容好好再联系起来
。同时评委很仔细的帮你把一些明显的表达不妥或者英文叙述不对的也点出来了,楼主再找个人帮你把英文叙述论色一下就更好。
只需按照评审人提出的建议和错误之处进行修改就行了。该期刊基本上接收了你的文章啊。
6楼2012-01-03 17:26:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bingjianla2008

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
: Originally posted by jimmy1666 at 2012-01-03 12:46:12:
不是要把你的文章拆成2篇发表,他的主要意思是说你的文章的内容和着重点不统一,联系的不够紧密,也就是说有两个重点,但两个重点之间的逻辑性不强甚至没有多大的关联!那么这样看来你的文章实际上就是由两篇小文 ...

我老板的意思也是说不能拆开来,现在我就是要想办法来说明这个的完整性。
7楼2012-01-04 12:19:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bingjianla2008

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
: Originally posted by epirsgis at 2012-01-03 13:46:27:
拆成两篇可a发表。评价很高啊。
[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]

不能分成2篇呀,前面的那个还好说,后面的那个的数据有很多是从NCBI中下载下来的哦,根本不能考究其取样点的
8楼2012-01-04 12:20:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bingjianla2008

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
: Originally posted by xenopus at 2012-01-03 15:11:18:
如只有这一个审稿人,我觉得可以分成两篇,如还有别的审稿人,可能要慎重了

现在的审稿意见只有这个,我现在是想编辑跟审稿人的意见,我该听说的呢?
9楼2012-01-04 12:21:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bingjianla2008

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
: Originally posted by dkoo1jxau at 2012-01-03 17:26:40:
minor revisions
编辑的意思是小修改了,先恭喜楼主了。
第一位评审人的意思大概是你得内容有两大块,但从你文中的叙述来看并不是联系的很紧密,所以他觉得似乎是两个独立的内容。个人觉得你最好是能够把这两部 ...

是呀,我的意思也是不能拆开的,我现在也想怎么衔接这篇文章的2部分内容,我做的是有关系统计划这方面的东西,其实本意不是做系统进化的,是做了一个物种的线粒体全序列,我发现其中有个基因发生了突变,这个突变刚好在同一科中的某个物种上也有报道,这是一部分内容。还有一部分内容是用了线粒体中的一个基因做了下这个区域中的几百个样本的遗传多样性分析。所以我也很纠结怎么把它们衔接起来,能给点建议?
10楼2012-01-04 12:27:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 bingjianla2008 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 刚刚收到科研之友邮件 +21 olivermiaoer 2024-06-19 30/1500 2024-06-20 20:49 by 王杨卢骆_
[博后之家] 在国内某高校做全职博士后2年,现在找到新的单位,出站或退站对新工作有什么影响? +3 nxplfcc 2024-06-20 3/150 2024-06-20 19:50 by zhangysbad
[有机交流] 跑板能跑开,过柱过不纯怎么办 +6 小胡在努力 2024-06-18 8/400 2024-06-20 18:54 by HF111001
[论文投稿] 求机械类四区sci推荐 5+4 迷茫小旷 2024-06-14 7/350 2024-06-20 17:42 by 不一样烟火12345
[基金申请] 青年基金会评专家到底是怎么会评的呀?主审专家是不是一般不会改动系统按函评给的顺序 5+4 他山攻玉之石 2024-06-18 18/900 2024-06-20 16:33 by 他山攻玉之石
[精细化工] 试剂价格 +5 旭必上岸 2024-06-17 8/400 2024-06-20 16:25 by 旭必上岸
[有机交流] 怎么萃取出锡盐内包裹的化合物 +3 硕六过 2024-06-19 4/200 2024-06-20 15:45 by 2461777831
[考博] 这个博士要读吗 +15 Sea Breeze 2024-06-16 29/1450 2024-06-20 14:30 by Sea Breeze
[硕博家园] 豫北虫友互识 +11 xuhongli903 2024-06-18 12/600 2024-06-20 13:32 by 1429524838
[基金申请] 希望今年自己国自然面上项目和老婆青年项目能中! +10 恐龙爸爸 2024-06-14 10/500 2024-06-20 08:42 by jsguo4127
[论文投稿] Scientific Reports二审90天了,催稿也没反应怎么办? +3 智晨君 2024-06-18 6/300 2024-06-19 20:08 by licheng78
[访问学者] 国家公派访问学者申请结果出了吗? +4 65syn 2024-06-13 4/200 2024-06-19 16:40 by 海洋之心168
[公派出国] 去英国的小伙伴儿都在哪儿租的房子呀? +7 65syn 2024-06-14 11/550 2024-06-19 10:19 by 65syn
[论文投稿] 审稿人含糊拒稿,还需要回复吗?如何回复? 20+4 BruceChum 2024-06-15 22/1100 2024-06-19 08:00 by kanyechris
[公派出国] CSC德国博后每个月资助多少呀?够用吗 +4 326lhpqk 2024-06-16 7/350 2024-06-19 02:03 by PLHOU
[论文投稿] 投稿求助 10+3 2022_灵魂工程师 2024-06-16 8/400 2024-06-18 12:12 by 投必得科研顾问
[高分子] 烧瓶内合成聚酯 +3 大帝国乐 2024-06-17 7/350 2024-06-18 11:10 by 大帝国乐
[有机交流] 求教最后一步问题出在哪 20+3 苏州浩恒 2024-06-15 4/200 2024-06-18 08:33 by like_2005
[论文投稿] 投稿被一个审稿人恶意评审了怎么样? +5 1chen 2024-06-14 7/350 2024-06-15 23:15 by xy66xy
[论文投稿] 投稿时忘记修改一作 +7 gll123456 2024-06-13 11/550 2024-06-15 11:49 by gll123456
信息提示
请填处理意见