| 查看: 3505 | 回复: 11 | ||
bingjianla2008金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
哪位高人能帮我看看这个审稿意见是什么意思？
|
|
Dear Dr Hong: Your manuscript entitled "文章名" which you submitted to 杂志名, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter. The review is in general favorable and suggest that, subject to minor revisions, your paper could be suitable for publication. Please consider these suggestions, and we look forwards to receiving your revision. Please attend to all of the suggestions made by the reviewer. They are all very reasonable and I think should make your paper much much better. When you revise your manuscript please highlight the changes you make in the manuscript by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or colored text. Please enter your responses to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. You can use this space to document any changes you made to the original manuscript. Please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s). IMPORTANT: Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission. Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to 杂志名, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission. Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Mitochondrial DNA and I look forward to receiving your revision. Sincerely, Dr Rob DeSalle 杂志名, Editor-in-Chief Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Corresponding Author Letter to the authors 文章编号 This MS deals with interesting but bipartite subjects concerning to (1) comparative mitochondrial genomics of l物种名 and (2) lphylogeography in a Chinese major lake. This MS should thus be mede up to two separate MSs; one includes mitochondrial genomics, and the other about phylogeography. See a letter to the authors for details. Regarding the first matter, the authors made an interesting finding of the length variation of “基因名”. It is empirically known that vertebrate “基因名” shows highly conserved features with few indels. Addition of the extra amino-acid tail may be an uncommon structural change specific to the “物种”. The authors confirmed this structural change by cDNA analysis. I am sorry, however, to say that I do not know an appropriate reference describing the length conservation of vertebrate “基因名”. The authors should find it or make an alignment by themselves from a wide range of representative vertebrates from human to sharks or lampreys. The authors' phylogenetic analysis based on the complete mtDNA sequences gave good resolution. The tree should be just or close to the true tree, and the authors can provide strong discussions. In this regard, I think “一个物种”and “另外一个物种”also have the tailed “基因”. If so, the authors can discuss on this particular sequence structure of ”基因“ as a phylogenetic signal. I think the reorganized MS on the first matter will be a good and interesting report. Regarding the second matter, the authors may give some phylogeographical discussions on “物种名”from China including the research lake. To do this, however, the authors should first make clear the localities of loach sequences from other studies. If adequately reorganized as a phylogeographic report, the second MS would also be worth publishing in an international journal like '杂志名'. The content of this MS, however, is quite immature as the present delivery. The English writing style needs improvements aided by English proofreaders. The authors' data handling has several errors. See a list below for detail. 请哪位高手帮我看看，这个编辑是什么意思呢？是不是要我把文章拆成2篇发表，还是说别的意思呢？现在拿不定主意。 [ Last edited by seapass on 2012-1-3 at 11:18 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
278求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
293调剂
已经有16人回复
-
273求调剂
已经有45人回复
-
22408 266求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
266求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
一志愿华东理工085601材料工程303分求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
生物学328分求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
277求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
265求调剂
已经有21人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 请帮忙看看这条审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
- 帮忙看看这个审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
- 【求助】有劳虫友高手帮忙看看acs审稿意见，多谢！
已经有5人回复
- 意见返回，麻烦大家帮忙看看这是什么意思，还有希望吗
已经有9人回复
- 求助！哪位高人帮我看看审稿意见啥意思
已经有6人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个审稿意见
已经有23人回复
- 【求助】请大家帮我看看Applied Catalysis B 的审稿意见吧，谢谢啦
已经有14人回复
- 谁能帮我看看这个审稿回复是啥意思？？？？？？谢谢了
已经有5人回复
- 【讨论】大家帮我看看审稿意见呗！！！
已经有7人回复
- Talanta文章被拒，但请各位帮我看看这样的审稿意见是什么意思
已经有15人回复
- 各位虫友帮我看看这个审稿意见
已经有8人回复
- 论文一审回来了，有一些审稿意见，请大家帮我看看是什么意思。
已经有5人回复
- 这个审稿意见帮看看，看了直冒汗
已经有36人回复
- 请大家帮我看下这个审稿意见是什么意思？
已经有5人回复
2楼2012-01-03 12:46:12
epirsgis
木虫 (著名写手)
- SEPI: 5
- 应助: 39 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 4942.1
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 2666
- 在线: 150.2小时
- 虫号: 1361004
- 注册: 2011-08-04
- 专业: 流行病学方法与卫生统计
3楼2012-01-03 13:46:27
4楼2012-01-03 15:11:18
yaodeyaode
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 18 (小学生)
- 金币: 1736.8
- 散金: 4971
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 3427
- 在线: 164.8小时
- 虫号: 815932
- 注册: 2009-07-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 细胞信号转导
5楼2012-01-03 15:46:30
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
avast2009(金币+4): 攻关帖特别奖励 2012-01-05 12:18:40
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
avast2009(金币+4): 攻关帖特别奖励 2012-01-05 12:18:40
|
minor revisions 编辑的意思是小修改了，先恭喜楼主了。 第一位评审人的意思大概是你得内容有两大块，但从你文中的叙述来看并不是联系的很紧密，所以他觉得似乎是两个独立的内容。个人觉得你最好是能够把这两部分内容能够统一起来，一般不建议你真的删除一部分，只用其中一部分的内容。 另外，楼主做得似乎是关于新物种和一个线粒体基因组的比较以及一些进化树方面的内容，希望楼主自己把评审提到的两部分内容好好再联系起来 。同时评委很仔细的帮你把一些明显的表达不妥或者英文叙述不对的也点出来了，楼主再找个人帮你把英文叙述论色一下就更好。 只需按照评审人提出的建议和错误之处进行修改就行了。该期刊基本上接收了你的文章啊。 |
6楼2012-01-03 17:26:40
bingjianla2008
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1160.9
- 帖子: 566
- 在线: 57.6小时
- 虫号: 156415
- 注册: 2006-01-05
- 专业: 动物资源与保护
7楼2012-01-04 12:19:36
bingjianla2008
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1160.9
- 帖子: 566
- 在线: 57.6小时
- 虫号: 156415
- 注册: 2006-01-05
- 专业: 动物资源与保护
8楼2012-01-04 12:20:52
bingjianla2008
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1160.9
- 帖子: 566
- 在线: 57.6小时
- 虫号: 156415
- 注册: 2006-01-05
- 专业: 动物资源与保护
9楼2012-01-04 12:21:51
bingjianla2008
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1160.9
- 帖子: 566
- 在线: 57.6小时
- 虫号: 156415
- 注册: 2006-01-05
- 专业: 动物资源与保护
10楼2012-01-04 12:27:03
