24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

bingjianla2008

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1160.9
帖子: 566
在线: 57.6小时
虫号: 156415
注册: 2006-01-05
专业: 动物资源与保护

[求助] 哪位高人能帮我看看这个审稿意见是什么意思？

Dear Dr Hong:

Your manuscript entitled "文章名" which you submitted to 杂志名, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter.

The review is in general favorable and suggest that, subject to minor revisions, your paper could be suitable for publication. Please consider these suggestions, and we look forwards to receiving your revision.

Please attend to all of the suggestions made by the reviewer. They are all very reasonable and I think should make your paper much much better.

When you revise your manuscript please highlight the changes you make in the manuscript by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or colored text.

Please enter your responses to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. You can use this space to document any changes you made to the original manuscript. Please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s).

IMPORTANT: Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to 杂志名, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission.

Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Mitochondrial DNA and I look forward to receiving your revision.

Sincerely,
Dr Rob DeSalle
杂志名, Editor-in-Chief

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Corresponding Author
Letter to the authors
文章编号
This MS deals with interesting but bipartite subjects concerning to (1) comparative mitochondrial genomics of l物种名 and (2) lphylogeography in a Chinese major lake. This MS should thus be mede up to two separate MSs; one includes mitochondrial genomics, and the other about phylogeography. See a letter to the authors for details.

Regarding the first matter, the authors made an interesting finding of the length variation of “基因名”. It is empirically known that vertebrate “基因名” shows highly conserved features with few indels. Addition of the extra amino-acid tail may be an uncommon structural change specific to the “物种”. The authors confirmed this structural change by cDNA analysis. I am sorry, however, to say that I do not know an appropriate reference describing the length conservation of vertebrate “基因名”. The authors should find it or make an alignment by themselves from a wide range of representative vertebrates from human to sharks or lampreys.
The authors' phylogenetic analysis based on the complete mtDNA sequences gave good resolution. The tree should be just or close to the true tree, and the authors can provide strong discussions. In this regard, I think “一个物种”and “另外一个物种”also have the tailed “基因”. If so, the authors can discuss on this particular sequence structure of ”基因“ as a phylogenetic signal.
I think the reorganized MS on the first matter will be a good and interesting report.
Regarding the second matter, the authors may give some phylogeographical discussions on “物种名”from China including the research lake. To do this, however, the authors should first make clear the localities of loach sequences from other studies.
If adequately reorganized as a phylogeographic report, the second MS would also be worth publishing in an international journal like '杂志名'.

The content of this MS, however, is quite immature as the present delivery. The English writing style needs improvements aided by English proofreaders. The authors' data handling has several errors. See a list below for detail.
请哪位高手帮我看看，这个编辑是什么意思呢？是不是要我把文章拆成2篇发表，还是说别的意思呢？现在拿不定主意。

[ Last edited by seapass on 2012-1-3 at 11:18 ]

回复此楼