24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

qianye325326

铜虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1025
帖子: 312
在线: 119.2小时
虫号: 1029266

[交流] 文章的审稿意见，大家帮忙看看！

文章审稿意见，建议修改，大家帮我看看这些问题，发表的机会大么？
同样一篇文章没有确定发表之前还可以投其他的会议么？

1. In section 2.1, authors mentioned lactose and fats contents were measured by Spectrophotometry methods. Would authors provide information more in details such as at what wavelength et al.

2. Some citations in the paper are not arranged properly. For example, authors cited reference 9 and 10 in section 2.3. Do it mean the same measurement were done in ref. 9 and 10, or any other reason for putting citation there? The same issue happens for the ref. 11 and 12.

3. In table 2, it might be better to show the concentration values as well. Otherwise, it is hard to say if it is within measurement error limit or the real removal for fat percentage decreasing from 0.01% to 0.
3. Page 3, last paragraph need to be rewritten. It was not written properly in English.

4. In Figure 2, authors discussed the effect of pressure on permeate flux. What did the permeate flux refer to? Did it refer to the final stabilized permeate flux? As the permeate flux dropped continuous during the constant pressure experiments. The same question occurred in Figure 3 and 4.

5. In section 3.5, please define the concept of concentration factor in the paper.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

急，请大家帮忙看看这个审稿意见，困惑....... 已经有13人回复
投了一篇小文章，审稿意见有一条，大家帮忙看看什么意思啊已经有7人回复
审稿意见回来了，大家帮忙分析一下，有些意见看不懂？已经有14人回复
投稿有答复了，些许激动请大家帮忙看看，谢谢大家！（在13楼增加第二封审稿意见）已经有32人回复
投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？已经有32人回复
【求助】请大家帮我看看Applied Catalysis B 的审稿意见吧，谢谢啦已经有14人回复
审稿意见回来了，大家帮忙看一下。。已经有9人回复
大家帮忙看这样的审稿意见还有必要改吗，还是改投别的期刊呀！已经有23人回复
Talanta文章被拒，但请各位帮我看看这样的审稿意见是什么意思已经有15人回复
审稿意见，大家帮忙看看已经有8人回复
请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见已经有4人回复
【求助】审稿意见大家帮忙看看，急呀！已经有8人回复
审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不已经有24人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-02-10 18:05:31

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

应助: 2283 (讲师)
贵宾: 0.05
金币: 17310.5
帖子: 15735
在线: 2926.6小时
虫号: 489254

qianye325326(金币+1): 2011-02-11 13:25:51

投了杂志，就别再投会议，没事没关系，有事就麻烦了。

这样的审稿意见，还不赶快好好改？我若看到高兴都来不及，再好就觉得亏了（应该投更好的杂志）。

赞一下

回复此楼

2楼2011-02-10 18:11:45

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

xjajx

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 1.796
金币: 10465.4
帖子: 1967
在线: 495.2小时
虫号: 1134415

qianye325326(金币+1): 2011-02-11 13:25:56

引用回帖:

Originally posted by qianye325326 at 2011-02-10 18:05:31:
文章审稿意见，建议修改，大家帮我看看这些问题，发表的机会大么？
同样一篇文章没有确定发表之前还可以投其他的会议么？

1. In section 2.1, authors mentioned lactose and fats contents were measured by ...

这个审稿人提的问题都非常简单，貌似问题很多，其实每个问题几句话就可以，最怕那种只有一句话，让你补实验的，审稿人的意见都不是大问题

赞一下

回复此楼

3楼2011-02-10 18:27:57

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖