24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2723  |  回复: 32

solskjaer200

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 急,大家看看我这审稿意见有戏吗??

投的TGRS,下面是审稿意见:
Associate Editor Comments:

The manuscript has been evaluated by two reviewers. Both state that the mansucript has sufficient potential for a future publication in TGRS. There were, however, several issues like the choice of appropriate parameters or the style of presentation which should be addressed and amended in accordance to the reviewer suggestions. Such a revised manuscript will also improve both the relevance and readability for a wider audience.

--

Reviewers Comments:

Reviewer 1:

Please see comments in attached file (review1.pdf).

--

Reviewer 2:

Section 2 lacks novelty, the work has been done before in the references provided and
elsewhere, but this can be justified as part of a review.

Equation (17) and following: The author shold note that these assume that the
irregularites are infinitely elongated along the y-axis and therefore represent equatorial scintillation only.

Text just above equation (20): Strictly speaking, within context, there is no need to
assume that the drift velocity is zero, since, if the frozen-in assumption is made, this
can just be added to the scanning velocity during the aperture period.

English:
The English in this paper is good enough to be understood technically, but could be
improved for publication. Note that on p7, above eqn 20, thw word "dose" instead of "does" should be corrected.

感觉是有戏,但是我我的帐号是Major Revision 要大修啊!第一个审稿人给的意见也不多。这是什么情况??请大神帮我分析分析!!!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mselxj

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
当然有戏,好好改了投过去!
2楼2013-06-27 11:49:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chyb0422

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
solskjaer200(esub代发): 金币+1, 感谢应助 2013-06-27 22:58:48
建议好好修改一番, ‘several issues like the choice of appropriate parameters or the style of presentation’。
然后resubmit,cover letter也要好好写。
俺们都是化学人!
3楼2013-06-27 11:53:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xbzhang2012

新虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
solskjaer200(esub代发): 金币+1, 感谢应助 2013-06-27 22:59:23
不管是小修还是大修,按照审稿人的意见认真修改,就完全有戏。一般来说,有修改的机会基本就没有问题了,前提是仔细认真地解决了审稿人的问题。
4楼2013-06-27 11:58:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

solskjaer200

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by mselxj at 2013-06-27 11:49:40
当然有戏,好好改了投过去!

这位大哥,一般是不是只有小修和大修两种状态?你说我这机会大不??
5楼2013-06-27 12:20:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

solskjaer200

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by chyb0422 at 2013-06-27 11:53:46
建议好好修改一番, ‘several issues like the choice of appropriate parameters or the style of presentation’。
然后resubmit,cover letter也要好好写。

这位大哥,cover letter也要修改吗?还有我这回复意见你觉得机会大不啊??
6楼2013-06-27 12:23:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

husky

铁杆木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
呵呵!恭喜,好好修改吧,问题不大,把审稿人关心的问题回答清楚即可。
7楼2013-06-27 12:41:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hwceng0816

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
只要是修改,基本都会接收!

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
8楼2013-06-27 12:54:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

伤哒心

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ...
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
solskjaer200: 金币+98, ★★★★★最佳答案 2013-06-28 00:07:14
你这个好好修改,有很大的几率命中。感觉评价都还是比较正面的,不是什么原则性问题。
走别人的路,让别人无路可走
9楼2013-06-27 14:13:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

20082556

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
很有戏啊,按照审稿人的意见改就行 了
10楼2013-06-27 14:20:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 solskjaer200 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见