24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3564  |  回复: 32
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

solskjaer200

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 急,大家看看我这审稿意见有戏吗??

投的TGRS,下面是审稿意见:
Associate Editor Comments:

The manuscript has been evaluated by two reviewers. Both state that the mansucript has sufficient potential for a future publication in TGRS. There were, however, several issues like the choice of appropriate parameters or the style of presentation which should be addressed and amended in accordance to the reviewer suggestions. Such a revised manuscript will also improve both the relevance and readability for a wider audience.

--

Reviewers Comments:

Reviewer 1:

Please see comments in attached file (review1.pdf).

--

Reviewer 2:

Section 2 lacks novelty, the work has been done before in the references provided and
elsewhere, but this can be justified as part of a review.

Equation (17) and following: The author shold note that these assume that the
irregularites are infinitely elongated along the y-axis and therefore represent equatorial scintillation only.

Text just above equation (20): Strictly speaking, within context, there is no need to
assume that the drift velocity is zero, since, if the frozen-in assumption is made, this
can just be added to the scanning velocity during the aperture period.

English:
The English in this paper is good enough to be understood technically, but could be
improved for publication. Note that on p7, above eqn 20, thw word "dose" instead of "does" should be corrected.

感觉是有戏,但是我我的帐号是Major Revision 要大修啊!第一个审稿人给的意见也不多。这是什么情况??请大神帮我分析分析!!!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hwceng0816

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
只要是修改,基本都会接收!

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
8楼2013-06-27 12:54:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 33 个回答

mselxj

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
当然有戏,好好改了投过去!
2楼2013-06-27 11:49:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chyb0422

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
solskjaer200(esub代发): 金币+1, 感谢应助 2013-06-27 22:58:48
建议好好修改一番, ‘several issues like the choice of appropriate parameters or the style of presentation’。
然后resubmit,cover letter也要好好写。
俺们都是化学人!
3楼2013-06-27 11:53:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xbzhang2012

新虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
solskjaer200(esub代发): 金币+1, 感谢应助 2013-06-27 22:59:23
不管是小修还是大修,按照审稿人的意见认真修改,就完全有戏。一般来说,有修改的机会基本就没有问题了,前提是仔细认真地解决了审稿人的问题。
4楼2013-06-27 11:58:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +4 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 4/200 2026-09-01 14:58 by jiaoxg
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-09-01 12:58 by ssyjh
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论 (金币+15) +15 晴天加油 2026-08-26 16/800 2026-08-29 18:28 by symmetry
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 系统查不到 +11 董八千 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 18:06 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +6 huang1991js 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 08:42 by winsaint
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
信息提示
请填处理意见