24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

solskjaer200

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 549.1
散金: 100
帖子: 149
在线: 55.8小时
虫号: 1877666
注册: 2012-07-03
专业: 空间物理

[求助] 急，大家看看我这审稿意见有戏吗？？

投的TGRS，下面是审稿意见：
Associate Editor Comments:

The manuscript has been evaluated by two reviewers. Both state that the mansucript has sufficient potential for a future publication in TGRS. There were, however, several issues like the choice of appropriate parameters or the style of presentation which should be addressed and amended in accordance to the reviewer suggestions. Such a revised manuscript will also improve both the relevance and readability for a wider audience.

--

Reviewers Comments:

Reviewer 1:

Please see comments in attached file (review1.pdf).

--

Reviewer 2:

Section 2 lacks novelty, the work has been done before in the references provided and
elsewhere, but this can be justified as part of a review.

Equation (17) and following: The author shold note that these assume that the
irregularites are infinitely elongated along the y-axis and therefore represent equatorial scintillation only.

Text just above equation (20): Strictly speaking, within context, there is no need to
assume that the drift velocity is zero, since, if the frozen-in assumption is made, this
can just be added to the scanning velocity during the aperture period.

English:
The English in this paper is good enough to be understood technically, but could be
improved for publication. Note that on p7, above eqn 20, thw word "dose" instead of "does" should be corrected.

感觉是有戏，但是我我的帐号是Major Revision 要大修啊！第一个审稿人给的意见也不多。这是什么情况？？请大神帮我分析分析！！！

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

自荐读博已经有9人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球已经有8人回复
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动已经有4人回复
求个博导看看已经有18人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

这样的审稿意见如何回复已经有5人回复
审稿意见，大家给些建议啊已经有59人回复
reject and resubmission 大家给我看看审稿意见已经有31人回复
IEEE EDL的审稿意见，大家看看。已经有12人回复
大家来看看这条审稿意见是什么意思？我做的是重金属吸附的材料已经有14人回复
电子与信息学报回来的一个意见，现在已经辗转到第四个审稿专家了，大家帮忙看看已经有28人回复
大家来看看这个审稿人到底是什么意思？已经有17人回复
审稿意见已回，大家给看看已经有9人回复
急请大家帮我看看审稿结束后编辑部给发的信息，谢谢啊已经有7人回复
哪位高人能帮我看看这个审稿意见是什么意思？已经有11人回复
论文审稿意见回来了，大家看看如何回复啊已经有16人回复
这样的审稿意见，大家见过没，求助下已经有12人回复
大家帮我看看这个审稿意见已经有23人回复
投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？已经有32人回复
文章的审稿意见，大家帮忙看看！已经有6人回复
【讨论】大家帮我看看审稿意见呗！！！已经有7人回复
审稿意见回来了，大家帮我看看还有希望吗已经有3人回复
审稿意见，大家帮忙看看已经有8人回复
请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见已经有4人回复
【求助】审稿意见大家帮忙看看，急呀！已经有8人回复
审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不已经有24人回复

1楼 2013-06-27 11:20:27

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

solskjaer200

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 549.1
散金: 100
帖子: 149
在线: 55.8小时
虫号: 1877666
注册: 2012-07-03
专业: 空间物理

引用回帖:

3楼: Originally posted by chyb0422 at 2013-06-27 11:53:46
建议好好修改一番， ‘several issues like the choice of appropriate parameters or the style of presentation’。
然后resubmit，cover letter也要好好写。