| 查看: 4679 | 回复: 12 | ||
lijuanmin铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
投Analytical Chemistry,一个大修，一个拒稿，编辑给拒了，还用申诉吗？ 已有7人参与
|
|
Dear Prof. Yu: I am reporting on the above manuscript, which you recently submitted for consideration in Analytical Chemistry. After a careful study of the manuscript and considering the reviewers' comments, I regret to inform you that I have decided against publication. The potential usefulness of your work is not in question. However, in light of the reviewers' evaluation and comments, I do not believe that publication is justified. I hope you will find the reviewers' specific comments helpful in planning future work. These comments are either included here or, if they were given in the form of a file, will appear at the bottom of the copy of this letter which will appear and be stored in your Author Center. I appreciate the opportunity to have considered this contribution, and thank you for your interest in Analytical Chemistry. Kind regards, Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Should not be published in Analytical Chemistry. Comments: The authors reported a fluorescence turn-on method for the detection of Hg2+ based on the interaction of perylene probe and Au nanoparticles. In fact, the similar sensing strategies have been reported elsewhere, the paper itself lacks novelty. Moreover, the following questions should also be addressed. 1. In the introduction, the outstanding advantages of fluorescence assays compared with the reported methods are imprecise (Page 3, line 31-34). 2. In the manuscript, the authors state that the formation of the Au/Hg amalgam resulted in release of the probes. However, the probes should be added in the system after the formation of Au/Hg amalgam according to the Experimental Section and Scheme 1. 3. Some experiments and data should be supplemented. For example, the corresponding stability of the system, the corresponding concentrations should be noted in Figures for clearness, errors bars should be added in Fig. 5, and the experimental conditions for the detection of Hg2+ in lake water samples should be described in detail. 4. As for the selectivity, the authors only selected common divalent metal ions, other valent metal ions such as Ag+, Fe3+ should be performed. 5. The limit of detection (LOD) value of 5 nM was reported. How about the maximum residue limit of Hg2+ in drinking water as prescribed in Europe or USA? In addition, the authors should describe how the LOD was calculated. 6. For the real sample analysis, the sensors should be ultrasensitive, simple, rapid, and inexpensive. The chip sensor is a good choice, so the reported method could be further developed onto a chip sensor. Additional Questions: Significance: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Originality: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Broad Interest: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Technical Quality: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes Are the references appropriate and correct?: In Part Is the English adequate?: In Part Is the quality of the figures sufficient?: In Part Are the data statistically significant with appropriate controls included?: In Part Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: May eventually be publishable, but requires major revisions as indicated. Comments: This manuscript reports a novel fluorescence turn-on strategy based on Au nanoparticles and a perylene probe for the sensing of Hg2+ ions. Although the mechanism behind the synthesis &detection are carefully studied and the results are clearly presented, this work need major revise to satisfy the requirement of publication in Anal. Chem. Please take into account the following comments: 1. The author stated that the fluorescence turn-on strategy to detect Hg2+ ions. Form the meaning of “turn-on”, we think that the fluorescence of perylene probe is first quenched by Au NPs. Then with increasing of Hg2+ ions, the fluorescence of the sensor was becoming more and more strong. But in the actual detection, the sensing of Hg2+ was performed in two separate progresses. How about the results when the experiment was performed in the continuous detection progress? 2. In the study of selectivity of the sensor, the author selected a few ions only in (Ⅱ), how about the interference when ions (Ⅰ&Ⅲ) present? Such as Ag+? Additional Questions: Significance: High (suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Originality: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Broad Interest: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Technical Quality: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In Part Are the references appropriate and correct?: Yes Is the English adequate?: Yes Is the quality of the figures sufficient?: In Part Are the data statistically significant with appropriate controls included?: In Part |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有49人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有21人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有5人回复
-
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制，评价高的钱多评价低的钱少，但是增加资助率
已经有8人回复
-
各位道友，我要去昆明玩几天，回来见。
已经有7人回复
-
filecode
已经有10人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有11人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有8人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有37人回复
-
好奇怪的filecode
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 投APPLIED INTELLIGENCE，大修后第二次被外行审稿人侮辱，编辑拒稿，气死了！
已经有12人回复
- sci审稿回复，两个大修后接受，一个拒稿，这种情况怎么办？
已经有12人回复
- RSC ADV 拒稿申诉后，接到编辑回信
已经有14人回复
- 审稿意见同意发表，但被编辑拒稿是什么问题？
已经有14人回复
- sci一个拒绝，一个推荐发表，编辑拒稿，是否申诉？？？
已经有39人回复
- 一个审稿人建议小修，另一个审稿人拒稿，最后编辑拒稿，怎么办？
已经有15人回复
- 三个审稿人,一个直接拒掉,两个要大修,各位看看还有戏没?
已经有15人回复
- 编辑给出大修意见，但是3个审稿人各只有一个意见，如何大修？
已经有9人回复
- 为什么审稿人意见是大修而被编辑拒了呢？
已经有11人回复
- 审稿人一个拒稿一个大修，编辑给大修，求助
已经有26人回复
- 论文两个审稿人让小修，一个审稿人拒绝，结果编辑拒稿了，这种情况还有希望吗？
已经有41人回复
- 编辑直接拒稿想申诉
已经有33人回复
- 投JMCC 一个审稿人拒稿，一个审稿人建议大修，然后就被编辑直接拒了，好伤心
已经有32人回复
- 编辑拒稿，没有给出明确理由，可以申诉吗？
已经有34人回复
- 论文大修，2审稿人，其中一个措辞很严肃，请大家看看编辑会怎么考虑？
已经有9人回复
- 大修后被编辑拒掉，重投会换审稿人吗？
已经有13人回复
- 一个拒稿，一个小修，这文章命运如何？
已经有30人回复
- 一个审稿人同意接受，一个审稿人大修，结果主编给拒了，该怎么办
已经有7人回复
- 大修后返回修改稿，收到编辑一封信（附信件内容），是准备拒稿吗？
已经有17人回复
- 审稿人说大修，但是论文被拒，给编辑再发邮件申诉有用吗 7.19 更新
已经有30人回复
- 有没有两个审稿人一个拒，一个大修，然后编辑reject但是可以resubmit
已经有16人回复
- 拒稿重投的稿件到编辑那边好长时间了还没给审稿人,怎么回事?
已经有15人回复
2楼2015-01-08 15:43:23
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
3楼2015-01-08 15:46:42
aboluo198331
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 300 (大学生)
- 金币: 24601.8
- 散金: 4197
- 红花: 112
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 22903
- 在线: 1194.5小时
- 虫号: 1360294
- 注册: 2011-08-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 土壤学
4楼2015-01-08 15:56:29
自私的猫1988
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4800 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 6.746
- 金币: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 红花: 256
- 沙发: 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在线: 1473.7小时
- 虫号: 2004083
- 注册: 2012-09-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
5楼2015-01-08 20:52:45
tmty
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 10 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 10804.5
- 散金: 492
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 1047
- 在线: 347.7小时
- 虫号: 1334251
- 注册: 2011-06-29
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境污染化学
6楼2015-01-08 21:31:58
虫群之心
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 50 (小学生)
- 金币: 1414.8
- 散金: 576
- 红花: 18
- 帖子: 907
- 在线: 226.1小时
- 虫号: 3372386
- 注册: 2014-08-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机材料化学
7楼2015-01-08 21:59:21
雨梦无声
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 451 (硕士)
- 金币: 1687.6
- 散金: 8792
- 红花: 41
- 帖子: 1728
- 在线: 744.5小时
- 虫号: 1830549
- 注册: 2012-05-23
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 分析化学
8楼2015-01-08 23:33:50
lijuanmin
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 981.9
- 散金: 98
- 帖子: 214
- 在线: 537.2小时
- 虫号: 1312109
- 注册: 2011-06-01
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 分析仪器与试剂
9楼2015-01-09 10:55:06
lijuanmin
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 981.9
- 散金: 98
- 帖子: 214
- 在线: 537.2小时
- 虫号: 1312109
- 注册: 2011-06-01
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 分析仪器与试剂
10楼2015-01-09 10:55:50
