| 查看: 6408 | 回复: 15 | |||||
[交流]
三个审稿人,一个直接拒掉,两个要大修,各位看看还有戏没? 已有13人参与
|
|||||
|
审稿意见:reject&resubmit Thank you for your submission to Green Chemistry. Please find the reviewers’ reports on your manuscript copied below. The reviewers feel that the paper is unsuitable for publication in its present form, and that substantial revisions are necessary before the paper could be reconsidered for publication. We therefore feel unable to proceed with publication at this stage. However, we would like to encourage you to fully address the concerns of all the reviewers, in particular the concerns of referee 3 regarding the suitability for Green Chemistry, and resubmit an appropriately revised manuscript to Green Chemistry. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to further peer review before a decision is reached. I look forward to a resubmission. Yours sincerely, Helen Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Referee: 1 Comments to the Author Recommendation: This paper cannot be accepted for publication in Green Chemistry because there is it does not provide new physical insights. Comments: The manuscript of authors, reports a complete work in which the preparation and characterization of catalyst samples, and a catalytic reaction, transesterification for biodiesel production, are presented. Among the catalyst properties investigated, the basicity of the surfaces, studied by CO2 probe and by a model reaction, represents the most important part of the manuscript. This is a right choice as the Zn-Al hydrotalcites are basic materials and their catalytic activity is in relation with their basicity. Unfortunately, there is not a sufficient original approach for the publication of this manuscript in Green Chemistry, nor concerning the studied materials neither concerning the methodological approach and the reaction. The present manuscript is a good systematic work which merits to be published in another type of scientific journal. In my opinion, it would be better to select the most basic catalyst and to deepen the study of its catalytic performances giving also quantitative kinetic evaluations of the reaction. Details: Strong basic surfaces can be easily covered by adsorbed carbonate species when exposed to air. For comparative purposes, have been the catalysts studied both without and with thermal treatment, made with the final aim of cleaning the surfaces ? It was possible to observe some differences in the obtained catalytic results on the carbonated surfaces and on the carbonate-free surfaces? Nothing has been written about the carbon balance during the transesterification reaction. The amounts of basic sites of the different catalyst samples have to be expressed in micromol per unit surface (micromol/m2) instead of micromol per unit mass (micromol/g) (see Table 4). I cannot find Table 4 cited in the text. Referee: 2 Comments to the Author The authors present an interesting, well-examined study on stable heterogeneous catalysts for transesterification of soybean oil to biodiesel. The Zn-Al containing compounds are characterized in detail, the conclusions are comprehensible. Concerning the application of the catalyst, the long on-stream time is remarkable and should give reason to further investigations in regard to a scale-up. The basis of the integration of IR band areas is not clearly explained (e.g. Table 5). For a comparison of inorganic materials with different BET surfaces the band areas denoted to adsorbed species should be related to the same BET surface, that means a division of IR band areas by BET surface. Probably it was done but it should be explained better. Page 7, line 32-88: This paragraph is a little bit confusing. Please discuss the amount and type (bridging or terminal) of methoxy species in both dehydrated Zn-Al hydrotalcies and Zn-Al oxides abridged and more clearly. Page 1, line 46: the number 3 has to be written with subscripted character in the formula of nitrate A problem is the quality of English usage. There are so many mistakes that it is not possible to correct them all. A general revision is necessary, if possible, by a native speaker. Referee: 3 - adjudicator Comments to the Author This manuscript reports the characterization of zinc-aluminum hydrotalcites and subsequent transesterification. The catalysis seems anecdotal based on the amount of time spent on the application compared to the characterization. This is unfortunate as it could be a highlight. The catalysis should be expanded before the manuscript can be accepted. On the characterization, the N2 sorption needs work. Show the isotherms and discuss the data in terms of the isotherms. What do the isotherms look like? Does the hysteresis suggest slit-like mesopores, or some other shapes? (see paper by Kruk and Jaroneic for more information on characterization) The sorption data seems to contradict the methanol data where reactivity is discussed in terms of surface area (1st paragraph on p5). Why can't methanol access surface hydroxyls in a 6 nm mesopore? Other issues: 1) Perform ammonia-TPD to assess the surface acidity and compare to the CO2-TPD for a better understanding of the surface chemistry. 2) Consider what tables and figures are most important and move others to Supplementary Information. Some of the schemes, figures, and tables are not that important, especially when duplicated as Scheme 1 and Table 2 appear to be. 3) Why was 2 hrs chosen for the calcination time? What happens if the time is varied? 4) What was the atmosphere for the thermal analysis? Air and nitrogen would produce different results that will result in different interpretations. Please elaborate. 5) List the column type (C18, wax, etc) with the model. Also consider using an internal standard such as trimethylbenzene to quantify the GC results. 6) Draw the mechanism to assist the discussion - here is an important picture, more important than Scheme 1 in my opinion. 7) For the methanol IR, why not do MeOH-temperature programmed reaction (TPR), as described by Israel Wachs and Alexis Bell, and look for formaldehyde as a product. Wachs makes the argument for your technique, although slightly different as he focuses on the catalysis. Utilize this and make the characterization stronger by showing the interaction with the produce. With a stronger MeOH section, the transesterification section can be short. Overall, this work is more suited for a catalysis journal; however, after significant revisions, it could be reconsidered for Green Chemistry. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 还不如直接拒掉,我再投别的杂志!唉! 不知道各位虫友有没有遇到这种情况,都是怎么处理的? [ Last edited by 仗剑落花 on 2013-10-23 at 08:44 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 SCI写作、投稿、经验 | 审稿意见及相关 |
» 猜你喜欢
溴的反应液脱色
已经有5人回复
-
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？
已经有8人回复
-
纳米粒子粒径的测量
已经有7人回复
-
常年博士招收(双一流，工科)
已经有4人回复
-
推荐一本书
已经有10人回复
-
参与限项
已经有5人回复
-
有没有人能给点建议
已经有5人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 编辑给出大修意见，但是3个审稿人各只有一个意见，如何大修？
已经有9人回复
- l两个大修，编辑拒稿，是否可重投该杂志？
已经有11人回复
- 投JMCC 一个审稿人拒稿，一个审稿人建议大修，然后就被编辑直接拒了，好伤心
已经有32人回复
- SCI文章大修,四个审稿人,有一个不同意发表,大修返回后,据的这个审稿人态度会改变吗
已经有15人回复
- 论文大修，2审稿人，其中一个措辞很严肃，请大家看看编辑会怎么考虑？
已经有9人回复
- 一个审稿人同意接受，一个审稿人大修，结果主编给拒了，该怎么办
已经有7人回复
- 大修快一个月了，怎么还没有消息？已经过了编辑给审稿人的日期了。
已经有14人回复
- 3个审稿人，2个同意录用，1个审稿人始终拒稿，结果会如何？
已经有74人回复
- 初审意见两个审稿人，一个强调创新性不强，一个要求大修. 该 怎样回复啊？ 谢谢
已经有39人回复
- 修改稿会给一审中拒绝发表的审稿人再审吗？
已经有19人回复
- 审稿人要求大修，却被编辑给拒了，是否可以申诉？
已经有15人回复
- 一审大修，修改稿换审稿人后旋即被拒，结结实实郁闷了一把
已经有20人回复
- 投稿Langmuir，审稿人都说可以发表，编辑拒稿，这种情况有必要申诉吗？
已经有10人回复
- 审稿人要求大修，编辑直接拒稿咋办？
已经有7人回复
- 论文被拒，但编辑说按审稿人的意见修改后再重新提交还是有可能会接受
已经有25人回复
- 有没有两个审稿人一个拒，一个大修，然后编辑reject但是可以resubmit
已经有16人回复
- 大修之后还有两个审稿人认为语言不行，该怎么办呢
已经有13人回复
- 一个说据，一个说小修，结果裁定为大修
已经有28人回复
- 投SCI大修，审稿人2个同意一个拒稿
已经有18人回复
淡水云烟
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
铁杆木虫
- 应助: 20 (小学生)
- 金币: 11274.9
- 散金: 556
- 红花: 17
- 帖子: 2749
- 在线: 172.3小时
- 虫号: 377375
- 注册: 2007-05-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 数学
2楼2013-10-23 08:39:52
3楼2013-10-23 09:05:38
5楼2013-10-23 09:31:19
4楼2013-10-23 09:27:31
6楼2013-10-23 09:37:36
7楼2013-10-23 09:43:48
summer-star
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4678
- 散金: 463
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 691
- 在线: 929.9小时
- 虫号: 1335675
- 注册: 2011-07-01
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 无机材料化学
8楼2013-10-23 10:12:03
9楼2013-10-24 18:26:09
raymon7805
银虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 255 (大学生)
- 金币: 103.5
- 散金: 6202
- 红花: 33
- 帖子: 3329
- 在线: 989.5小时
- 虫号: 735766
- 注册: 2009-03-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 能源化工
10楼2013-10-24 19:27:47