应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 科研生活区 » English Cafe » Opinion » 【weekly topic】To dismantle or not dismantle
201/2返回列表12下一页
查看: 2014  |  回复: 19
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看

winter_north

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

[交流] 【weekly topic】To dismantle or not dismantle

We are experiencing a rapid urbanization now. The cities are expanding their boundaries to all directions, north, south, east, west, upward, downward. More and more villages are caught into the arms of city. These villages become into village-in-city.

What’s the fate of such urban villages?

I don’t know much about such village. At first sight, the buildings in these villages are not beautiful, some are short, some are tall, but everyone has a similar shape, without little element in their design, they are only built for use, so all the decorations are left out, in order to reduce the cost. Do these houses have pipe line systems for sewage, tap water and gas? I don’t know. Perhaps conditions may be different in different cities.

The lanes in these villages are very narrow, compared with the wide street in the cities. House rent in these villages are low, they become very good homes for newly graduated students and for farmers who come to work in cities.

Often, the building in such villages are not tall, but in one such villages in our city, building are all about 8-10 stories tall, compared with 4-5 in other villages.

In order to make the city beautiful, all the villages are being dismantled now. It is easy to dismantle such villages. Only about 20 days are needed to pull down such a village.

Then taller, more beautiful buildings will be build at the sites of these villages.

It seems who pay for it is not important.

But, obviously, dismantling such buildings is a waste.

A couple of years ago, a 28-story building beside the West Lake in Hangzhou was dismantled. Compared with such a building, buildings in urban villages can only be regarded as nothing.

But, they are buildings, they are built with cement, brick, steel, workers got paid for their building process. Although they are shabby, they are not beautiful, they can still be used. It is said that the life of a building in China is 70 years. But, too often, many buildings are pulled down in their childhood.

A question is, do such building have to be pulled down?

What’s your opinion?

[ Last edited by curton on 2012-9-20 at 23:17 ]
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

Weekly Topic

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

倩瑶

» 猜你喜欢
1楼 2012-09-20 21:26:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖置顶 ( 共有3个 )

tuqin2575

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

专家
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
shuixian2009: 回帖置顶 2012-09-21 17:38:53
winter_north: 金币+10, ESEPI+1, Yes, I aso think they should be dismantled, at least partly protected or left. 2012-09-22 00:16:40
I don't think they should be dismantled. Even in the developed countries there are many slums in the center of the city, why should the old buildings for the underprivileged be dismantled?
For the general planning or layout of the whole city, they may need equal beautiful buildings. But in fact, the houses and simple apartments in the outskirt of the city are established for urgent use, not for the visitors' eyes. The city are developed, improved by the citizens and for the citizens, so the government should take into their needs into account first. People are born equal, and citizens living in the downtown or the suburbs should be equal in the share of common resources, so those from the villages need not to sacrifice their simple  demands to the commercial use of only a dose of citizens.
In the next step, we should consider how to rebuid or decorate the houses in the suburban areas in an convenient and pratical way rather than dismantle them or leave them they used to be. In America, there are many movable houses and buildings in the farms that can be small and exquisite. Likewise, in the rebuilding of old houses some new building materials can be introduced or exact standards can be made. These may cost far less than building new ones and also can benefit more people because the same problems are faced nationally.  
To balance between the requirements from the downtown and the suburban areas asks for the efforts from many sectors and aspects, technologies, management and laws. Maybe some of us wil contribute to that.



[ Last edited by tuqin2575 on 2012-9-21 at 13:46 ]
赞一下(3人) 回复此楼
Befreeinyourway,justliketheshinninglighteveryday.
9楼2012-09-21 13:43:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

rchiuctw

木虫 (著名写手)

太极拳初学者
★ ★
winter_north: 金币+2, Hehe, whol will protect? 2012-09-22 00:14:41
winter_north: 回帖置顶 2012-09-22 00:15:06
Housing old enough for memorial represent civilization of our rice.
However, the education system is the spirit of culture, old and facing challenges from nowaday people as they have learned the western style, who will protect?
赞一下 回复此楼
零星落索，一贫如洗，两袖清风，三餐不继，四壁徒空，五内如焚，六神无主，七窍生烟，八方受敌，九死一生，十分危殆，百感交集，千夫所指，万念俱灰
14楼2012-09-21 23:16:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ningmengoooo

铜虫 (小有名气)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
winter_north: 金币+6, Yes, living conditions in China are not good, we have too many inhabitants. 2012-09-22 02:41:54
winter_north: 回帖置顶 2012-09-22 02:42:09
Some old houses which possess special culture and history should not be dismantled, but others can be pulled down for the new city if they are too old and shabby. Meanwhile, the government should focus on the quality of people' life except for the modern facilities. In some places in German, it seems people are living in a beautiful park, there are many lawns and flowers. I think if more and more of such cities appeared in China, people will be very happy.

[ Last edited by ningmengoooo on 2012-9-22 at 00:49 ]
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
17楼2012-09-22 00:46:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

zhyq8767
★
小木虫: 沙发+1，金币+0.5, 恭喜抢个沙发，再给个红包
2楼2012-09-20 21:27:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

st200403

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

111
★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.2, 抢了个小板凳，给个红包
winter_north: 金币+1, This should be changed. 2012-09-20 22:52:53
Someone said that the average life of a building in China is 30 years
赞一下 回复此楼
Anonymous.
3楼2012-09-20 21:42:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

winter_north

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by st200403 at 2012-09-20 21:42:51
Someone said that the average life of a building in China is 30 years

That's true.
回复此楼
4楼2012-09-20 22:52:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mrzhanglijun

金虫 (正式写手)
shuixian2009: Only English here. Thanks 2012-09-21 12:54:58
给力！作者是国人？

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
心依旧，执着
5楼2012-09-21 10:32:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gujinwang

木虫 (正式写手)
★ ★
shuixian2009: 金币+2, Yeah. Thing that has gone never can come back 2012-09-21 12:55:56
in china,we haven\'t realized the importance of protecting old buildings.once they are dismantled,our memories will have no trace to think back.

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
6楼2012-09-21 10:50:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dagong72zs

银虫 (小有名气)
shuixian2009: Only English here 2012-09-21 12:56:08
不错，很犀利的文笔
赞一下 回复此楼
自强厚德
7楼2012-09-21 11:35:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Kangzhenhua

木虫 (著名写手)
★ ★
shuixian2009: 金币+2, Yeah. It is common in village. The old houses are dismantled and the new ones arise 2012-09-21 12:58:28
For some village, it is necessary to dismantle some old houses, because they are  so old and shabby, and would be destroyed by wind and rain one day.
赞一下 回复此楼
也无风雨也无晴。
8楼2012-09-21 12:25:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fym11fym

木虫 (正式写手)
★ ★
winter_north: 金币+2, Yes, this is nostalgia. 2012-09-22 00:19:21
My house be dismantled for a new city. The new house is very convenient which has modern facilities, but the scenery disppeared which I familiar with .
赞一下 回复此楼
期望在最美丽的时候遇见你
10楼2012-09-21 14:57:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 winter_north 的主题更新
201/2返回列表12下一页
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭