24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

winter_north

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

ESEPI: 113
应助: 1 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.321
金币: 5614.5
散金: 1975
红花: 45
沙发: 21
帖子: 4840
在线: 929.3小时
虫号: 1567257
注册: 2012-01-06
性别: GG
专业: 污染控制化学

[交流] 【weekly topic】To dismantle or not dismantle

We are experiencing a rapid urbanization now. The cities are expanding their boundaries to all directions, north, south, east, west, upward, downward. More and more villages are caught into the arms of city. These villages become into village-in-city.

What’s the fate of such urban villages?

I don’t know much about such village. At first sight, the buildings in these villages are not beautiful, some are short, some are tall, but everyone has a similar shape, without little element in their design, they are only built for use, so all the decorations are left out, in order to reduce the cost. Do these houses have pipe line systems for sewage, tap water and gas? I don’t know. Perhaps conditions may be different in different cities.

The lanes in these villages are very narrow, compared with the wide street in the cities. House rent in these villages are low, they become very good homes for newly graduated students and for farmers who come to work in cities.

Often, the building in such villages are not tall, but in one such villages in our city, building are all about 8-10 stories tall, compared with 4-5 in other villages.

In order to make the city beautiful, all the villages are being dismantled now. It is easy to dismantle such villages. Only about 20 days are needed to pull down such a village.

Then taller, more beautiful buildings will be build at the sites of these villages.

It seems who pay for it is not important.

But, obviously, dismantling such buildings is a waste.

A couple of years ago, a 28-story building beside the West Lake in Hangzhou was dismantled. Compared with such a building, buildings in urban villages can only be regarded as nothing.

But, they are buildings, they are built with cement, brick, steel, workers got paid for their building process. Although they are shabby, they are not beautiful, they can still be used. It is said that the life of a building in China is 70 years. But, too often, many buildings are pulled down in their childhood.

A question is, do such building have to be pulled down?

What’s your opinion?

[ Last edited by curton on 2012-9-20 at 23:17 ]

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

Weekly Topic

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

倩瑶

» 猜你喜欢

拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写已经有8人回复
最失望的一年已经有12人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗已经有29人回复
求推荐英文EI期刊已经有5人回复
请教限项目规定已经有4人回复
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？已经有20人回复
26申博已经有3人回复
基金委咋了？2026年的指南还没有出来？已经有10人回复
基金申报已经有6人回复
疑惑？已经有5人回复

1楼 2012-09-20 21:26:17

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

tuqin2575

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

专家

ESEPI: 42
应助: 1 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.681
金币: 5636.5
散金: 469
红花: 36
沙发: 4
帖子: 2701
在线: 234.6小时
虫号: 1543081
注册: 2011-12-19
性别: MM
专业: 农业水利

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
shuixian2009: 回帖置顶 2012-09-21 17:38:53
winter_north: 金币+10, ESEPI+1, Yes, I aso think they should be dismantled, at least partly protected or left. 2012-09-22 00:16:40

I don't think they should be dismantled. Even in the developed countries there are many slums in the center of the city, why should the old buildings for the underprivileged be dismantled?
For the general planning or layout of the whole city, they may need equal beautiful buildings. But in fact, the houses and simple apartments in the outskirt of the city are established for urgent use, not for the visitors' eyes. The city are developed, improved by the citizens and for the citizens, so the government should take into their needs into account first. People are born equal, and citizens living in the downtown or the suburbs should be equal in the share of common resources, so those from the villages need not to sacrifice their simple demands to the commercial use of only a dose of citizens.
In the next step, we should consider how to rebuid or decorate the houses in the suburban areas in an convenient and pratical way rather than dismantle them or leave them they used to be. In America, there are many movable houses and buildings in the farms that can be small and exquisite. Likewise, in the rebuilding of old houses some new building materials can be introduced or exact standards can be made. These may cost far less than building new ones and also can benefit more people because the same problems are faced nationally.
To balance between the requirements from the downtown and the suburban areas asks for the efforts from many sectors and aspects, technologies, management and laws. Maybe some of us wil contribute to that.