| 查看: 2463 | 回复: 19 | ||||
| 本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||||
winter_north铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
|
[交流]
【weekly topic】To dismantle or not dismantle
|
|||
|
We are experiencing a rapid urbanization now. The cities are expanding their boundaries to all directions, north, south, east, west, upward, downward. More and more villages are caught into the arms of city. These villages become into village-in-city. What’s the fate of such urban villages? I don’t know much about such village. At first sight, the buildings in these villages are not beautiful, some are short, some are tall, but everyone has a similar shape, without little element in their design, they are only built for use, so all the decorations are left out, in order to reduce the cost. Do these houses have pipe line systems for sewage, tap water and gas? I don’t know. Perhaps conditions may be different in different cities. The lanes in these villages are very narrow, compared with the wide street in the cities. House rent in these villages are low, they become very good homes for newly graduated students and for farmers who come to work in cities. Often, the building in such villages are not tall, but in one such villages in our city, building are all about 8-10 stories tall, compared with 4-5 in other villages. In order to make the city beautiful, all the villages are being dismantled now. It is easy to dismantle such villages. Only about 20 days are needed to pull down such a village. Then taller, more beautiful buildings will be build at the sites of these villages. It seems who pay for it is not important. But, obviously, dismantling such buildings is a waste. A couple of years ago, a 28-story building beside the West Lake in Hangzhou was dismantled. Compared with such a building, buildings in urban villages can only be regarded as nothing. But, they are buildings, they are built with cement, brick, steel, workers got paid for their building process. Although they are shabby, they are not beautiful, they can still be used. It is said that the life of a building in China is 70 years. But, too often, many buildings are pulled down in their childhood. A question is, do such building have to be pulled down? What’s your opinion?     [ Last edited by curton on 2012-9-20 at 23:17 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 Weekly Topic |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
倩瑶» 猜你喜欢
帮忙看看fileCode
已经有8人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有3人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有15人回复
-
filecode
已经有8人回复
-
确定了，国自然21号放榜
已经有7人回复
-
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分？
已经有11人回复
-
关于代码变化问题，想知道的进来
已经有24人回复
-
为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果
已经有3人回复
-
静等基金结果
已经有16人回复
-
我的国基提前知道中了，可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了，怎么会有这样的人
已经有11人回复
tuqin2575
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
专家
- ESEPI: 42
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.681
- 金币: 5636.5
- 散金: 469
- 红花: 36
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 2701
- 在线: 234.6小时
- 虫号: 1543081
- 注册: 2011-12-19
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 农业水利
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
shuixian2009: 回帖置顶 2012-09-21 17:38:53
winter_north: 金币+10, ESEPI+1, Yes, I aso think they should be dismantled, at least partly protected or left. 2012-09-22 00:16:40
shuixian2009: 回帖置顶 2012-09-21 17:38:53
winter_north: 金币+10, ESEPI+1, Yes, I aso think they should be dismantled, at least partly protected or left. 2012-09-22 00:16:40
|
I don't think they should be dismantled. Even in the developed countries there are many slums in the center of the city, why should the old buildings for the underprivileged be dismantled? For the general planning or layout of the whole city, they may need equal beautiful buildings. But in fact, the houses and simple apartments in the outskirt of the city are established for urgent use, not for the visitors' eyes. The city are developed, improved by the citizens and for the citizens, so the government should take into their needs into account first. People are born equal, and citizens living in the downtown or the suburbs should be equal in the share of common resources, so those from the villages need not to sacrifice their simple demands to the commercial use of only a dose of citizens. In the next step, we should consider how to rebuid or decorate the houses in the suburban areas in an convenient and pratical way rather than dismantle them or leave them they used to be. In America, there are many movable houses and buildings in the farms that can be small and exquisite. Likewise, in the rebuilding of old houses some new building materials can be introduced or exact standards can be made. These may cost far less than building new ones and also can benefit more people because the same problems are faced nationally. To balance between the requirements from the downtown and the suburban areas asks for the efforts from many sectors and aspects, technologies, management and laws. Maybe some of us wil contribute to that.  [ Last edited by tuqin2575 on 2012-9-21 at 13:46 ] |
9楼2012-09-21 13:43:08
ningmengoooo
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 450
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 246
- 在线: 144.9小时
- 虫号: 526300
- 注册: 2008-03-16
- 专业: 创新管理
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
winter_north: 金币+6, Yes, living conditions in China are not good, we have too many inhabitants. 2012-09-22 02:41:54
winter_north: 回帖置顶 2012-09-22 02:42:09
winter_north: 金币+6, Yes, living conditions in China are not good, we have too many inhabitants. 2012-09-22 02:41:54
winter_north: 回帖置顶 2012-09-22 02:42:09
|
Some old houses which possess special culture and history should not be dismantled, but others can be pulled down for the new city if they are too old and shabby. Meanwhile, the government should focus on the quality of people' life except for the modern facilities. In some places in German, it seems people are living in a beautiful park, there are many lawns and flowers. I think if more and more of such cities appeared in China, people will be very happy. [ Last edited by ningmengoooo on 2012-9-22 at 00:49 ] |
17楼2012-09-22 00:46:24
★
小木虫: 沙发+1，金币+0.5, 恭喜抢个沙发，再给个红包
小木虫: 沙发+1，金币+0.5, 恭喜抢个沙发，再给个红包
 |
2楼2012-09-20 21:27:56
st200403
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
111
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 21821.4
- 散金: 733
- 红花: 8
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 8097
- 在线: 1643.1小时
- 虫号: 440721
- 注册: 2007-10-27
- 专业: 数论
3楼2012-09-20 21:42:51
winter_north
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 113
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.321
- 金币: 5432.5
- 散金: 1975
- 红花: 46
- 沙发: 21
- 帖子: 4853
- 在线: 932.6小时
- 虫号: 1567257
- 注册: 2012-01-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 污染控制化学
4楼2012-09-20 22:52:36
mrzhanglijun
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 16 (小学生)
- 金币: 1299.7
- 散金: 76
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 565
- 在线: 76.5小时
- 虫号: 1323560
- 注册: 2011-06-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 合成药物化学
5楼2012-09-21 10:32:17
gujinwang
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 47 (小学生)
- 金币: 2403.4
- 散金: 307
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 738
- 在线: 232小时
- 虫号: 1656837
- 注册: 2012-03-01
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 中药学其他科学问题
6楼2012-09-21 10:50:07
dagong72zs
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 273.3
- 散金: 50
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 68
- 在线: 36.2小时
- 虫号: 1511057
- 注册: 2011-11-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电能储存与节电技术
7楼2012-09-21 11:35:51
Kangzhenhua
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3480.1
- 红花: 1
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 1505
- 在线: 311.2小时
- 虫号: 907540
- 注册: 2009-11-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学
8楼2012-09-21 12:25:42
fym11fym
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2004.8
- 散金: 146
- 帖子: 956
- 在线: 126.3小时
- 虫号: 1647297
- 注册: 2012-02-27
- 专业: 原子和分子物理
10楼2012-09-21 14:57:58
