24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

winter_north

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

ESEPI: 113
应助: 1 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.321
金币: 5614.5
散金: 1975
红花: 45
沙发: 21
帖子: 4840
在线: 929.3小时
虫号: 1567257
注册: 2012-01-06
性别: GG
专业: 污染控制化学

[交流] 【weekly topic】To dismantle or not dismantle

We are experiencing a rapid urbanization now. The cities are expanding their boundaries to all directions, north, south, east, west, upward, downward. More and more villages are caught into the arms of city. These villages become into village-in-city.

What’s the fate of such urban villages?

I don’t know much about such village. At first sight, the buildings in these villages are not beautiful, some are short, some are tall, but everyone has a similar shape, without little element in their design, they are only built for use, so all the decorations are left out, in order to reduce the cost. Do these houses have pipe line systems for sewage, tap water and gas? I don’t know. Perhaps conditions may be different in different cities.

The lanes in these villages are very narrow, compared with the wide street in the cities. House rent in these villages are low, they become very good homes for newly graduated students and for farmers who come to work in cities.

Often, the building in such villages are not tall, but in one such villages in our city, building are all about 8-10 stories tall, compared with 4-5 in other villages.

In order to make the city beautiful, all the villages are being dismantled now. It is easy to dismantle such villages. Only about 20 days are needed to pull down such a village.

Then taller, more beautiful buildings will be build at the sites of these villages.

It seems who pay for it is not important.

But, obviously, dismantling such buildings is a waste.

A couple of years ago, a 28-story building beside the West Lake in Hangzhou was dismantled. Compared with such a building, buildings in urban villages can only be regarded as nothing.

But, they are buildings, they are built with cement, brick, steel, workers got paid for their building process. Although they are shabby, they are not beautiful, they can still be used. It is said that the life of a building in China is 70 years. But, too often, many buildings are pulled down in their childhood.

A question is, do such building have to be pulled down?

What’s your opinion?

[ Last edited by curton on 2012-9-20 at 23:17 ]

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

Weekly Topic

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

倩瑶

» 猜你喜欢

1楼 2012-09-20 21:26:17

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

gujinwang

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 47 (小学生)
金币: 2403.4
散金: 307
红花: 10
帖子: 738
在线: 232小时
虫号: 1656837
注册: 2012-03-01
性别: GG
专业: 中药学其他科学问题

★ ★
shuixian2009: 金币+2, Yeah. Thing that has gone never can come back 2012-09-21 12:55:56

in china,we haven\'t realized the importance of protecting old buildings.once they are dismantled,our memories will have no trace to think back.

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]