| 查看: 2452 | 回复: 19 | ||||
| 本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
winter_north铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
|
[交流]
【weekly topic】To dismantle or not dismantle
|
|||
|
We are experiencing a rapid urbanization now. The cities are expanding their boundaries to all directions, north, south, east, west, upward, downward. More and more villages are caught into the arms of city. These villages become into village-in-city. What’s the fate of such urban villages? I don’t know much about such village. At first sight, the buildings in these villages are not beautiful, some are short, some are tall, but everyone has a similar shape, without little element in their design, they are only built for use, so all the decorations are left out, in order to reduce the cost. Do these houses have pipe line systems for sewage, tap water and gas? I don’t know. Perhaps conditions may be different in different cities. The lanes in these villages are very narrow, compared with the wide street in the cities. House rent in these villages are low, they become very good homes for newly graduated students and for farmers who come to work in cities. Often, the building in such villages are not tall, but in one such villages in our city, building are all about 8-10 stories tall, compared with 4-5 in other villages. In order to make the city beautiful, all the villages are being dismantled now. It is easy to dismantle such villages. Only about 20 days are needed to pull down such a village. Then taller, more beautiful buildings will be build at the sites of these villages. It seems who pay for it is not important. But, obviously, dismantling such buildings is a waste. A couple of years ago, a 28-story building beside the West Lake in Hangzhou was dismantled. Compared with such a building, buildings in urban villages can only be regarded as nothing. But, they are buildings, they are built with cement, brick, steel, workers got paid for their building process. Although they are shabby, they are not beautiful, they can still be used. It is said that the life of a building in China is 70 years. But, too often, many buildings are pulled down in their childhood. A question is, do such building have to be pulled down? What’s your opinion?     [ Last edited by curton on 2012-9-20 at 23:17 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 Weekly Topic |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
倩瑶» 猜你喜欢
关于filecode，很负责任的告诉大家
已经有7人回复
-
【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向
已经有5人回复
-
关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量
已经有7人回复
-
2026国自然放榜时间
已经有3人回复
-
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制，评价高的钱多评价低的钱少，但是增加资助率
已经有7人回复
-
好奇怪的filecode
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
st200403
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
111
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 21821.4
- 散金: 733
- 红花: 8
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 8097
- 在线: 1643.1小时
- 虫号: 440721
- 注册: 2007-10-27
- 专业: 数论
3楼2012-09-20 21:42:51
winter_north
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 113
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.321
- 金币: 5432.5
- 散金: 1975
- 红花: 46
- 沙发: 21
- 帖子: 4853
- 在线: 932.6小时
- 虫号: 1567257
- 注册: 2012-01-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 污染控制化学
4楼2012-09-20 22:52:36
mrzhanglijun
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 16 (小学生)
- 金币: 1299.7
- 散金: 76
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 565
- 在线: 76.5小时
- 虫号: 1323560
- 注册: 2011-06-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 合成药物化学
5楼2012-09-21 10:32:17
gujinwang
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 47 (小学生)
- 金币: 2403.4
- 散金: 307
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 738
- 在线: 232小时
- 虫号: 1656837
- 注册: 2012-03-01
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 中药学其他科学问题
6楼2012-09-21 10:50:07
20