24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2472  |  回复: 19
本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ,点击这里进行查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

winter_north

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

[交流] 【weekly topic】To dismantle or not dismantle

We are experiencing a rapid urbanization now. The cities are expanding their boundaries to all directions, north, south, east, west, upward, downward. More and more villages are caught into the arms of city. These villages become into village-in-city.

What’s the fate of such urban villages?

I don’t know much about such village. At first sight, the buildings in these villages are not beautiful, some are short, some are tall, but everyone has a similar shape, without little element in their design, they are only built for use, so all the decorations are left out, in order to reduce the cost. Do these houses have pipe line systems for sewage, tap water and gas? I don’t know. Perhaps conditions may be different in different cities.

The lanes in these villages are very narrow, compared with the wide street in the cities. House rent in these villages are low, they become very good homes for newly graduated students and for farmers who come to work in cities.

Often, the building in such villages are not tall, but in one such villages in our city, building are all about 8-10 stories tall, compared with 4-5 in other villages.

In order to make the city beautiful, all the villages are being dismantled now. It is easy to dismantle such villages. Only about 20 days are needed to pull down such a village.

Then taller, more beautiful buildings will be build at the sites of these villages.

It seems who pay for it is not important.

But, obviously, dismantling such buildings is a waste.

A couple of years ago, a 28-story building beside the West Lake in Hangzhou was dismantled. Compared with such a building, buildings in urban villages can only be regarded as nothing.

But, they are buildings, they are built with cement, brick, steel, workers got paid for their building process. Although they are shabby, they are not beautiful, they can still be used. It is said that the life of a building in China is 70 years. But, too often, many buildings are pulled down in their childhood.

A question is, do such building have to be pulled down?

What’s your opinion?


[ Last edited by curton on 2012-9-20 at 23:17 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ningmengoooo

铜虫 (小有名气)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
winter_north: 金币+6, Yes, living conditions in China are not good, we have too many inhabitants. 2012-09-22 02:41:54
winter_north: 回帖置顶 2012-09-22 02:42:09
Some old houses which possess special culture and history should not be dismantled, but others can be pulled down for the new city if they are too old and shabby. Meanwhile, the government should focus on the quality of people' life except for the modern facilities. In some places in German, it seems people are living in a beautiful park, there are many lawns and flowers. I think if more and more of such cities appeared in China, people will be very happy.

[ Last edited by ningmengoooo on 2012-9-22 at 00:49 ]
17楼2012-09-22 00:46:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 20 个回答

st200403

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

111

★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.2, 抢了个小板凳,给个红包
winter_north: 金币+1, This should be changed. 2012-09-20 22:52:53
Someone said that the average life of a building in China is 30 years
Anonymous.
3楼2012-09-20 21:42:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

winter_north

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by st200403 at 2012-09-20 21:42:51
Someone said that the average life of a building in China is 30 years

That's true.
4楼2012-09-20 22:52:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mrzhanglijun

金虫 (正式写手)

shuixian2009: Only English here. Thanks 2012-09-21 12:54:58
给力!作者是国人?

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
心依旧,执着
5楼2012-09-21 10:32:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 澳大利亚 Murdoch University 全奖博士招生(3个名额)地质化工冶金领域 +27 AI8RaGaPaSCR 2026-08-07 28/1400 2026-08-13 20:45 by ahfrCgoFVCRh
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 21/1050 2026-08-13 17:56 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +4 majunge000 2026-08-11 6/300 2026-08-13 16:50 by 四季常青藤
[基金申请] filecode +14 documentary 2026-08-10 16/800 2026-08-13 16:39 by 润生71
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-11 5/250 2026-08-13 12:56 by cratir
[基金申请] 2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B? +11 Tide man 2026-08-11 11/550 2026-08-13 07:35 by 撸猫猫
[基金申请] 好奇怪的filecode +5 布布和一二 2026-08-08 6/300 2026-08-12 16:11 by 云上清扬
[基金申请] 奇怪,两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样 +7 布布和一二 2026-08-10 10/500 2026-08-12 09:12 by 布布和一二
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +11 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 13/650 2026-08-12 08:17 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +3 yuleib84 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 21:53 by jnhyjjm
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +3 lnee 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 18:10 by 希望我好好的
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
[基金申请] 2026国自然放榜时间 +9 布布和一二 2026-08-08 9/450 2026-08-10 11:22 by xxxx2020
[基金申请] filecode与中标关系的预测 +5 布布和一二 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-09 16:15 by 袁向阳007
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家 +6 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-08 7/350 2026-08-08 22:13 by a_niu
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 化学口download_prp&fileCode的固定段好像这几天一直没变,有变的大神么? +3 Tide man 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-07 22:39 by Tide man
[基金申请] filecode变化情况 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-07 22/1100 2026-08-07 14:45 by 且听虎啸
信息提示
请填处理意见