24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

本帖产生 2 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

winter_north

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

ESEPI: 113
应助: 1 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.321
金币: 5614.5
散金: 1975
红花: 45
沙发: 21
帖子: 4840
在线: 929.3小时
虫号: 1567257
注册: 2012-01-06
性别: GG
专业: 污染控制化学

[交流] 【weekly topic】To dismantle or not dismantle

We are experiencing a rapid urbanization now. The cities are expanding their boundaries to all directions, north, south, east, west, upward, downward. More and more villages are caught into the arms of city. These villages become into village-in-city.

What’s the fate of such urban villages?

I don’t know much about such village. At first sight, the buildings in these villages are not beautiful, some are short, some are tall, but everyone has a similar shape, without little element in their design, they are only built for use, so all the decorations are left out, in order to reduce the cost. Do these houses have pipe line systems for sewage, tap water and gas? I don’t know. Perhaps conditions may be different in different cities.

The lanes in these villages are very narrow, compared with the wide street in the cities. House rent in these villages are low, they become very good homes for newly graduated students and for farmers who come to work in cities.

Often, the building in such villages are not tall, but in one such villages in our city, building are all about 8-10 stories tall, compared with 4-5 in other villages.

In order to make the city beautiful, all the villages are being dismantled now. It is easy to dismantle such villages. Only about 20 days are needed to pull down such a village.

Then taller, more beautiful buildings will be build at the sites of these villages.

It seems who pay for it is not important.

But, obviously, dismantling such buildings is a waste.

A couple of years ago, a 28-story building beside the West Lake in Hangzhou was dismantled. Compared with such a building, buildings in urban villages can only be regarded as nothing.

But, they are buildings, they are built with cement, brick, steel, workers got paid for their building process. Although they are shabby, they are not beautiful, they can still be used. It is said that the life of a building in China is 70 years. But, too often, many buildings are pulled down in their childhood.

A question is, do such building have to be pulled down?

What’s your opinion?

[ Last edited by curton on 2012-9-20 at 23:17 ]

回复此楼

» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）

倩瑶

» 猜你喜欢

本人42，博士刚毕业，现在找不到工作，怎么办？:( 已经有3人回复
交大在职博士（哲学、社会学）已经有4人回复
3,4-二羟基苯乙酮如何纯化？已经有5人回复
国基评审已经有10人回复
析晶已经有5人回复
国自然面上和省基金B类撒花已经有22人回复
2026-博士申请已经有4人回复
26级硕士毕业生求博导收留已经有4人回复
考研调剂已经有3人回复
急招9月入学博士，要有4级、最晚7月硕士毕业。精密电机驱控课题；学位材料已经有5人回复

1楼 2012-09-20 21:26:17

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

ningmengoooo

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 450
红花: 1
帖子: 246
在线: 144.9小时
虫号: 526300
注册: 2008-03-16
专业: 创新管理

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
winter_north: 金币+6, Yes, living conditions in China are not good, we have too many inhabitants. 2012-09-22 02:41:54
winter_north: 回帖置顶 2012-09-22 02:42:09

Some old houses which possess special culture and history should not be dismantled, but others can be pulled down for the new city if they are too old and shabby. Meanwhile, the government should focus on the quality of people' life except for the modern facilities. In some places in German, it seems people are living in a beautiful park, there are many lawns and flowers. I think if more and more of such cities appeared in China, people will be very happy.

[ Last edited by ningmengoooo on 2012-9-22 at 00:49 ]